Among the viable extensions of the standard model, an intriguing class of models involve the concept of a "hidden sector" of new particles only weakly coupled to the standard model one. These particles could be produced in the decay of heavy standard model particles, be invisible, but unstable, and thus soon decay back into standard model bodies, giving funny experimental signatures that our detectors could spot -if we looked for them carefully enough.
If you remember the "ghost muon" saga (see here and links therein for a four-post discussion), the measurement made by CDF in 2008 which hinted at the presence of events with multiple muons within narrow jets, the concept of hidden valley signatures will be more familiar. In the CDF analysis a large excess of these events was observed. The muons in those events had very large impact parameter - much larger than those of typical muons produced in the decay of long-lived hadrons such as B and D mesons (impact parameter is the distance between a back-propagated particle trajectory and the point where the hard collision has taken place). The large impact parameter could only be explained by the decay in flight of a particle with large decay fraction to muons.
We know how the ghost muon story ended: other experiments denied seeing anything similar, and a reexamination of a larger dataset brought CDF to publish a partial retractation, whereby a part of the excess was understood but not all of it; the mystery of the excess of events with many large impact parameter muon candidates thus remained to some extent unsolved, but it is generally believed to have been due to hadron punch-through that the CDF muon chambers were unable to distinguish well enough.
In ATLAS, however, they did search again for lepton jets in their 8 TeV data, as a probe of several models of new physics; their latest result appeared on the Cornell preprint arxiv yesterday. They looked for a rather generic signature of jets made by one or two "dark photons", the neutral long-lived particle with mass in the few GeV range that could decay to displaced electrons, muons, or pions. They saw no excess of data above their background predictions, and came out with two sets of results on the allowed parameter space of a model proposed by my fellow blogger Adam Falkowski and collaborators. The first is an exclusion of the branching fraction of Higgs boson into dark photons as a function of the dark photon lifetime. The second is an exclusion of some region of the parameter space spanned by the mass of the hypothetical dark photon and the "kinetic mixing term" that would tie it to the photon.
The latter result is shown in the busy graph below, which combines the ATLAS exclusion region (with different colours denoting different assumed branching fractions of the Higgs into two dark photons plus anything) with independent search results from other experiments. The sensitive region is not large, but this is a log-log plot which is notoriously deceiving as far as sizing up by eye the relative importance of the various searches. On the horizontal axis is the mass of the dark photon, and on the vertical axis the mixing parameter investigated by the searches.
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- How A Former Naturopath Can Help Unravel The Trickery of Alternative Medicine
- Nanotech: The Most Dangerous Science Least Carefully Done
- A Billion Years Ago, What Did Earth's Ancient Magnetic Field Look Like?
- Can A New Rule Trigger A Second EU Referendum? Petition Signatures Over 11% Of Total Votes Cast
- Finding All-Hadronic Top - Again
- Better Brains With Beer
- Insects Were Already Using Camouflage 100 Million Years Ago
- "Hi Robert; Hope you are doing well. Just wanted you to know that I've put up a new video regarding..."
- "so in a nutshell basically they're not taking worries seriously..."
- "Sentence makes perfect sense. Has it been fixed?..."
- "If its based on signature on rocks, then the hypothesis is wrong. Because rocks form from molten..."
- "You should proof read. The very first sentence makes no sense. Didn't bother reading the rest. ..."
- Cannabis Beverages: A New Way to Get High
- Got Zika? Thank an Environmentalist
- Magical Moron Moments: Burn Your Feet with Tony Robbins
- IARC is controversial – because they put ideology over science
- Congressman Bob Gibbs: Biotechnology is feeding millions
- Science For the Win: Pepsi’s Walk of Shame Back to Aspartame
- LGBT rights and protections are scarce in constitutions around the world, UCLA study finds
- Bacterial colonies in human body linked to presence of cancer in mouth and throat
- The Smithsonian celebrates the Panama Canal expansion
- What happens when you steam a planet?
- Clandestine black hole may represent new population