Banner
    The Psychology of a Car Owner
    By Enrico Uva | February 24th 2011 08:52 AM | 11 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    About Enrico

    After majoring in chemistry at Concordia University I worked briefly at Fisheries and Oceans' Arctic Biological Station and in the food industry...

    View Enrico's Profile
    Although I am not the biggest proponent of cars, I have to admit that the facts don't match their poor environmental image. Combustion of all transportation fuels accounts for only 14% to 26% of greenhouse gases. This includes contributions from trains, planes, buses, automobiles and other vehicles. Cement companies convert calcium carbonate to calcium oxide, releasing carbon dioxide in the process, but they escape public scrutiny.

    High temperatures within all internal combustion engines cause air's two main components to form nitrogen oxides and a subsequent soup of photochemical byproducts, but catalytic converters work well enough to dissociate nitrogen dioxide back into harmless oxygen and nitrogen. Because the converters are not fully efficient and because other factors come into play, serious smog can still form, but on most days in most Canadian and U.S. cities, the levels of ozone and peroxyacyl nitrates are within acceptable levels.

    I enjoy the typical car-in-the-uninhabited landscape commercials on TV. Not only do they sponsor the sports programming I watch, but they are not fully mythical. You could easily be the lone car within a half-mile on New York's Adirondack Northway or south of Oliver, British Columbia where you can witness the beauty of the surroundings and the suspension of time. But driving to work is not exactly the zoom-zoom experience.

    This is the underlying reason I avoid both public transit and the automomile whenever I can. I had the luxury of being able to choose my school,so after choosing one that is 1.6 km from my doorstep, I walk, cycle and even occasionally ski to work. On my way there, I photograph things that are almost as startling as the creamy peaks of the Adirondacks.

    Public transit, cycling and walking are impractical alternatives for many commuters. But we all know people who live close to a train station, bus stop or work itself and still drive. They choose not to alleviate traffic congestion; they decide not to help their cardiovascular systems and not to make life more interesting on the way to the punch-clock.

    The second and third car for most families are also not wise investments, given that the cost of an average quality car is comparable to the average annual net salary of an American. Factor in not only the money it takes for the extra insurance, registration and maintenance but also the time lost on additional changes of tires, more washing and waxing, more dealings with fallible mechanics, and one has to conclude that buying an extra car is a dubious decision.

    People also continue to drink and drive, not-sleep and drive, text and drive and for other reasons, over 30 000 Americans die each year in car accidents, which happens to be double the homicide rate. Excess driving only increases the probability of such a tragedy.

    Luckily for my backpack and helmet, I recently survived a collision with a car whose driver did not see me while she was turning left and I was cycling straight. I let her get away without even paying my bike shop bills. I was just glad I wasn't hurt, and it served as a powerful reminder to enjoy the luxury of the choice I have: to avoid the busy route and cycle through the park instead.

    Comments

    SynapticNulship
    On the issue of public transport vs. cars, when the job is too far away to walk and/or bike and/or you don't have/want a bicycle:

    The main advantage of driving a car to work instead of taking a bus is the comfort and privacy.  Taking a half-hour / hour ride on a public transportation bus in the Boston area is a nightmare of rude people (smelly, eating smelly food, so fat they take up 2 seats, talking loudly, playing music loudly, etc...) on a disgustingly dirty and smelly bus (and which is always at the wrong temperature), which if you're lucky won't break down.  (Note I'm not talking about the newer silver line buses which haven't turned into shit yet).  So once you can afford it, of course you will upgrade your standard of living for transport.

    Plus, with the bus, if you are 5 minutes late, you are then 1 hour late because you have to wait for the next bus.

    Personally, I upgraded from bus-riding to work to driving to work, however I still walk several miles a week (sometimes per day) within the city.  I also walk to the store and carry my shopping basket BY HAND unlike the rest of the weaklings around me (ok, to be fair I'm not the only one) and hand carry the bags back to my apartment.
    UvaE
    I've taken the Green line from Brookline to North Station a few times , and they were pleasant rides, but I guess those are not Boston's worst neighborhoods, and the few trips don't represent a statistically significant sample. When we lived in Honolulu, there were often homeless people who had spent the night at my stop, and during the many years of riding the city bus in Montreal I encountered my share of scary people.
    Gerhard Adam
    Of course, this presumes that you don't have utility needs beyond simply driving to work, etc.  If you have children, that changes the requirements.  In my case, I also have a fair amount stuff I have to haul around for animals, so a bicycle or public transportation isn't even on my radar.
    UvaE
    As I wrote, Public transit, cycling and walking are impractical alternatives for many commuters. I fully understand. We have an autistic son who annoyed the schoolbus driver and a "normal" teenage daughter. My wife took over the task of driving him to school, but last month I started to relieve her every second week while she buses or cycles to work.
    logicman
    I like bike!

    To understand the psychology of a (quite oiled old) bike rider, please see:

    MikeCrow
    I like cars! And motorcycles. Bicycles are fine, but they've never been in contention for work transportation.

    Fortunately in the middle of 2008 when gas prices were near their peak, I upgraded to working at home, now I walk to work, without having to step outside (thought that does leave me at home during the day to shovel snow and drive my son to work).
    Never is a long time.
    logicman
    I upgraded to working at home ...

    I downgraded to working at home.  It is most commonly known by the euphemism: retirement.

    :)
    UvaE
    Bicycles are fine, but they've never been in contention for work transportation.
    They could contend if people tried to live close to work. An amazing thing happened in our city. In 1991, the train and plane manufacturer, Bombardier, started this renowned residential project (won awards for city planning) Very green, lots of walkways etc.. It is practically next to one of their major airplane assembly plants(but hidden) so people could cycle to work from spring to fall and walk in winter. The workers were even offered a discount at a time when the housing market was already depressed. But few Bombardier employees chose to move into the area. Some said that they did not like the type of housing (looks very British) People can be very irrational!! That's why only government can tackle major health and environmental issues. Can you imagine if we expected a grassroots movement to fight smoking!?
    logicman
    Some said that they did not like the type of housing (looks very British)

    And what, pray, is wrong with that?

    Thinks: "Darn colonials!"

    ;-)
    UvaE
    We loved the British townhouses and street lights made to look like street lamps. See pic and article: http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/11138/
    logicman
    I remember when street lamps were still called lamp-posts and the last gas lamps were being converted to electric lamps on the Isle of Sheppey.  Later, many electric lamps were designed on the pattern of gas lamps.  Gas lamps had been designed on the pattern of oil lamps, which followed the previous design trends of the lant-horns - that's candle-holders to most people.

    LED clusters are now designed to look like the lamps that they, in turn, replace.  That's evolution, from candle-holder to hi-tech.  Now, if only the human brain had evolved since the days of lant-horns we would all be a whole lot brighter!

    Add a comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite><TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe><u><font>
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    CAPTCHA
    If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.