Re: The Pedosmile: Do Pedophiles Have A Certain Smile?

Did any of you dimwits actually read this article? After reading a number of the comments here, every has clearly just stopped to shoot off a message the first time something popped up in this that they didn't agree with. The author makes a clear distinction between active pedophiles and inactive pedophiles, yet there are people 'calling them out' saying the author makes no distinction what so ever.
Most of this conversation seems to have been sparked from the use of the word 'faggotry' by Maddox, a satirical writer. The author quotes the introductory paragraph of Maddox's article, then states in the next paragraph that he/she does not agree with the choice of words or see any problem with sexuality; yet you drooling retards need this shit spoonfed to you despite that..

Quit defending your vapid beliefs - it's unimportant, and quite frankly this isn't the forum for it. It'd be amazing to come to an article about topics such as these and discuss the development of the pedophiles brain and the myriad of reasons that make them who they are - but no, we're stuck with a bunch of semi-literate ketchup-bottle-brained fuckwits arguing over sexuality. Move on people, it's the internet, you're not going to convince anyone so step down from your moral highground, participate in the actual topic or shut the fuck up and let the rest of us enjoy the purpose of this forum: To discuss the questions raised by the author.