Fake Banner
    Why Yamanaka Deserved The Nobel Prize For Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
    By Paul Knoepfler | October 8th 2012 01:04 PM | 3 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    About Paul

    Associate Professor of Cell Biology and Human Anatomy at UC Davis School of Medicine. Long-time stem cell and cancer scientist. Cancer survivor...

    View Paul's Profile

    I believe and have argued for years that Shinya Yamanaka, the discoverer of induced pluripotent stem cells (aka iPS cells) deserves the Nobel Prize. 

    I'm very glad today that he received it.

    iPS cells are a big deal for biology and medicine.

    Some may find it a bit ironic that I believe so strongly in a Nobel for Yamanaka since over the years I have often been somewhat of a lonely voice in asserting that in the iPS cell field we need to accept iPS cells warts and all with particular emphasis on talking openly about the challenges faced by iPS cell research. In fact my lab just published a paper showing that in some important ways iPS cells are similar to cancer cells. I also just did a post (not knowing about the impending Nobel Prize) on the 7 challenges facing the iPS cell field.

    Face it folks,  iPS cells are not perfect. I predict they never will be made identical to embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Their safe and effective clinical use really does face serious hurdles.

    But that's OK.

    iPS cells and cellular reprogramming have still changed science and the world forever.

    And Yamanaka deserves the Nobel Prize. His passion, his intelligence, and his pushing new ways to think about cell biology are truly revolutionary. The cells themselves are exciting in many ways including in a way not so much thought about right at the beginning: as disease models. They may also be used therapeutically for cell therapy and regenerative medicine.

    Today is a great day for science and the stem cell field.

    Comments

    Hank
    John Gurdon, called the “godfather of cloning” for his work on nuclear transplantation, was told by a teacher that biology was a “total waste of time” and "this whole idea should be immediately discouraged.”

    Turns out it was much more rewarding than trying to be a competitive squash player.
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind
    pknoepfler
    Great comment, Hank.A big fuss in the stem cell world is why only 2 scientists instead of 3 were chosen since there is a lot of credit to go around: http://tinyurl.com/92cvxwv

    Paul
    Paul S. Knoepfler, Ph.D. Associate Professor UC Davis School of Medicine http://www.ipscell.com
    rholley
    To amplify Hank’s comment above, regarding the co-recipient, here is an article featuring the very school report:

    Sir John Gurdon, Nobel Prize winner, was 'too stupid' for science at school

    Robert H. Olley Quondam Physics Department University of Reading England