Banner
    Pirate Evolution
    By Samuel Kenyon | June 11th 2010 04:05 PM | 5 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    About Samuel

    Lead software engineer at iRobot Corp., user experience (UX) designer, agile manager, actor, writer, atheist transhumanist. My blog will attempt...

    View Samuel's Profile

    There is only one sign in my cubicle at work--it states: "Adapt or perish." It appears that many industries refuse to do that.

    This seems like news from five or ten years ago, and yet it's happening now: LimeWire being shut down [injunction proposal] and/or forced to pay one billion dollars in legal fines. Many have pointed out the financial scale might be greater than BP's fines for dumping vast wads of oil into the ocean.

    We've already left the Noughties, and yet the old fashioned record companies and their policedog RIAA still lumber on, trying to suck money out of the new breed (new 15 years ago, that is) of music distribution systems, and still trying to maintain the mainstream. I guess iTunes didn't satisfy the industry.

    I am part of the newer culture that wants to share information and art and choose where our money goes. I haven't bought a song or album since about 1997. What I pay for are live shows, and occasionally a T-shirt sold by the artist. I also go to DJ'd events, and in turn those DJs often buy vinyls or CDs.

    This is relevant to transhumanism because part of human enhancement is the system of humans, i.e. society, not just the individual instances of human. We long ago entered the world of copying bits willy-nilly so as to experience high-variation and high-quantity music. There's no turning back after that.

    "If evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will evolve" may be a mere bon mot, but it seems quite true in this case. Cultural informational evolution is just as important as phylogeny.

    Speaking of pirates, I will be splicing the mainbrace tonight at a pirate-themed goth-industrial party in Central Square. I'm sure the swashbuckling (ok, dancing) will render me in great form for the H+ summit tomorrow morning. Of course, since I'm an anti-rush-hour night owl, this 0800 start is going to be painful no matter what.

    Play this like you stole it:


    We by Monosurround

    Comments

    Hank
    The song is cool enough but I really like the comment avatars at the bottom.   The beauty of social media is finding new things I would never find on my own.  And they wrote it so it will work in compliant sites on compliant browsers! (you should get that hint, TED conference).

    Since you've been at this a long time, you have the benefit of hindsight, so is music piracy a real thing, or are they counting lost sales as people who were never going to buy it anyway?

    I use iTunes, for example, because I have no problem at all paying for quality stuff and they allow samples.   Same with video games.   But as a younger guy in college, using an Atari ST, there was very little software to buy in the US, so I ended up trading with people.  Did they lose money?  I guess so - I wasn't buying it.  Or did I keep the platform alive a lot longer than it otherwise would have lived?



    SynapticNulship
    Good point--piracy may indeed be a misnomer--you can have 1000 songs you paid for, or 1 million songs you didn't pay for.  Nobody would have made that $999000. 
    Gerhard Adam
    ... so is music piracy a real thing, or are they counting lost sales as people who were never going to buy it anyway?
    It would be an interesting comparison to see how many songs people have downloaded that truly represent pirated copies (especially for us old-timers).  Going back a spell, I have to consider that many songs that I have I've paid for more than once as the distribution media changes.  Once on vinyl, perhaps a cassette, then a CD.  After all, how many times should I have to buy the same piece of music?  So, I don't consider it "stealing" if I download a song that I already have several paid copies of.

    I know, in some cases, I've downloaded copies of songs that simply aren't available anywhere because the record company doesn't want to distribute it.  In those cases, it can hardly be called piracy.

    As for the record industry losing money ... well, I don't know about you, but I don't recall the last time I heard anything memorable in popular music.  Perhaps they should quit producing acts that suck?
    SynapticNulship
    After all, how many times should I have to buy the same piece of music? 

    If the vinyl market keeps growing, you'll be able to buy your songs again on records soon...:)

    http://www.nylvi.com/blog/vinyl-sales-up-is-vinyl-going-mainstream/
    Hank
    Vinyl never left for a lot of us and not because we are Luddites, but because some of us were the first generation of listeners to have quality go down.    First CDs - not good, since I can hear millions of analog timesteps and CDs think I should only be allowed 65K, but at least durable - and then this .mp3 disaster.

    It's always been a bit of a surprise how many releases still come out on vinyl.

    Add a comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite><TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe><u><font>
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    CAPTCHA
    If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.