There was a time, not too long ago, that I was not doing science. Because I remember that time, I also remember how completely ignorant I was of science.
This is no more apparent than the science of cannabinoids, i.e., the stuff in marijuana. My only knowledge of cannabinoids was that marijuana got you high and cured every disease. Having spent five years researching THC, I learned that there was a much richer, deeper story than that.
You see, the term cannabinoids, itself, is not operationally defined very easily. Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the main psychoactive constituent (not ingredient) of marijuana. However, there are many, many more "phytocannabinoids" contained in marijuana, which have no known pharmacological actions. Cannabidiol, another constituent of marijuana, also has no psychoactive properties, and is called non-THC oil (or so I see on the internet). Cannabidiol (CBD) is also found in Sativex along with THC, and has some pharmacological actions distinct from THC.
There are also endogenous cannabinoids, which are molecules synthesized within our body that act as part of an endogenous cannabinoid system. They are referred to as cannabinoids because they bind to cannabinoid receptors, which currently include cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) and 2 (CB2). These two endogenous cannabinoids are anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG).
In one sense, cannabinoids are defined as constituents of marijuana, even though they have no pharmacological efficacy that is known. In another sense, they are those molecules that bind to CB1 and CB2 receptors. In a third sense, cannabinoids are also classified by their actions in a preclinical behavioral battery known as the "tetrad." The tetrad is composed of four behavioral measures: catalepsy, locomotor inhibition, antinociception and hypothermia. In rodents, THC, other synthetic cannabinoids and endogenous cannabinoids (2-AG more so than AEA) produce these four behaviors.
When I was testing the effects of THC, I carried out tetrad studies. I can tell you that the tetrad is so repeatable that it was nice to have such a positive control. In one sense, it should be a law that THC produces the tetrad in rats or mice. Therefore, when someone refers to THC as a cannabinoid, ask them what a cannabinoid is, and you may be surprised by the answer. For now, this will be my first post on this subject. I apologize for the brevity, but I would like to get input on what people desire to know about THC/cannabinoids.
My next post will focus on the endogenous cannabinoid system and the pharmacological profile of THC, spice compounds and the endogenous cannabinoids.
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Greenpeace Says Its GMOs Are Better Than Science's GMOs, Still Hates Golden Rice
- Reduce Prostate Cancer Risk By Sleeping With Lots Of Women - But Not Men
- Homo Floresiensis: Hobbit Species Continues To Provoke Questions About Human Evolution
- Supersonic Laser-Propelled Aircraft Get A Step Closer
- Okay With Disgusting Images? You Vote This Way 95 Percent Of The Time
- Everyone Hates Daylight Savings Time - But It Might Improve Public Health
- This Mid-Term Election Can Have Evolutionary Consequences
- "The problem is, American agricultural science cannot be adopted world-wide for the simple reason..."
- "You're quote mining. When it comes to environmental risk, energy emissions from CO2 are back at..."
- "Of course they aren't. These are scientific terms Hank Campbell and you can't just interpret them..."
- "The wealthiest are only formally most educated and, from both my personal expriences and reading..."
- "You think the marker assisted selection suddenly being endorsed by Greenpeace is not genetic modification..."
- Battle of Britain: NGOs and scientists clash over proposal to loosen EU GMO restrictions
- Genetically modified clean energy from bacteria
- Designer babies: You can screen for cystic fibrosis but intelligence is a way off
- Science as profane: What superstition of 1752 and 2014 share in common
- What’s so “natural” about “natural crop breeding”?
- Worried you have cancer? Take a Google pill!