The U.S. spends more than double what other countries spend for medical care, $6,697 per capita in 2005, but a new Commonwealth Fund seven-nation survey finds that U.S. patients are more likely to skip care because of costs.
The study surveyed 12,000 adults in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. One third of U.S. adults called for rebuilding the system, the highest rate in any country surveyed. The U.S. also ranked last in saying only minor changes are needed in the health system.
Canadian patients are least likely to be able to get a same-day appointment with their physicians when sick and the most likely to seek care in emergency rooms as an alternative.
U.S. adults also have the highest out-of-pocket costs and greatest problems paying medical bills.
Regarding the concern that universal insurance systems result in long waits for care or “rationing,” over 50% of patients in Germany, the Netherlands, and New Zealand report rapid access to physicians while 30% of Americans do. Canada ranked last in patients saying they could get same-day appointments with their doctor at 22%.
Regarding access to elective surgery, the US ranked highest while over 50% of patients in Germany, New Zealand, and Australia waited less than a month for elective or non-emergency surgery and waits of 6 months or more were rare in these countries and the Netherlands. In Canada and the U.K., about 15% of patients reported waits of more than six months for elective or non-emergency surgery.
U.S. adults were most likely to have gone without care because of cost and to have high out-of-pocket costs. In the U.S., 37% of all adults and 42% of those with chronic conditions skipped medications or avoided recommended care in the past year because of costs, rates well above all other countries. In contrast to the U.S., patients in Canada, the Netherlands, and the U.K. rarely report having to forgo needed medical care because of costs.
In addition, one-fifth of U.S. adults report serious problems paying medical bills, more than double the rate in the next highest country. And nearly one third (30%) in the U.S. spent more than $1,000 in the past year out-of-pocket, a level rare in most of the other countries.
Treatment with no benefit
U.S and German adults most reported that doctors recommended treatment the patients thought had little or no benefit.
The Netherlands had the highest (31%) percentage of people who spent time on paperwork or disputes related to medical bills or insurance. The U.S. had 24%. In the other countries, fewer than 15% reported this concern.
Emergency room visits
Canada led the survey in emergency room visits with 39%. 36% of U.S. adults visited an emergency room. In both the U.S. and Canada, about 40 percent of those with an emergency room visit said the visit was for a condition that could have been treated by their regular doctor if available.
But primary physicians are highly valued
Adults in all seven countries placed high value on having a relationship with a regular source of primary health care that is accessible and coordinates their care, that knows their medical history, is easy to contact, and helps coordinate care received from other providers.
Across very different country health care systems, the study found that only 45 to 61 percent of adults described having a primary source of care with these key attributes.
In all countries, patients with primary care relationships reported significantly more positive experiences, including having more time with their doctors, more involvement in care decisions, and better coordination with specialists and hospitals.
Those with primary care were also much less likely to report medical errors, receiving conflicting information from different doctors or to encounter coordination problems, such as diagnostic tests or medical records not being available at the time of care and duplicate tests.
Read the entire Health Affairs article here.
Harris Interactive, Inc. and country affiliates conducted the interviews by telephone with nationally representative cross-sections of adults ages 18 and older in seven countries between March 6 and May 7, 2007.
The final study included 1,009 adults in Australia, 3,003 in Canada, 1,407 in Germany, 1,557 in the Netherlands, 1,000 in New Zealand, 1,434 in the United Kingdom, and 2,500 in the United States.
The Commonwealth Fund funded the core study, partnered with the Health Council of Canada to expand the Canadian sample, and cofunded fieldwork in the Netherlands with the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sport and the Center for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Radboud University, Nijmegen. The German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care funded the German sample. The interviews were conducted in German in Germany, Dutch in the Netherlands, and English in the five other countries, with an option for French in Canada and Spanish in the United States.
The margin of sample error for country averages are approximately ±2 percent for the United States and Canada and ±3 percent for the other five countries at the 95 percent confidence level.
The Commonwealth Fund is a private foundation working toward a high performance health system.
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Reduce Prostate Cancer Risk By Sleeping With Lots Of Women - But Not Men
- Greenpeace Says Its GMOs Are Better Than Science's GMOs, Still Hates Golden Rice
- Supersonic Laser-Propelled Aircraft Get A Step Closer
- Homo Floresiensis: Hobbit Species Continues To Provoke Questions About Human Evolution
- Okay With Disgusting Images? You Vote This Way 95 Percent Of The Time
- Everyone Hates Daylight Savings Time - But It Might Improve Public Health
- This Mid-Term Election Can Have Evolutionary Consequences
- "The problem is, American agricultural science cannot be adopted world-wide for the simple reason..."
- "You're quote mining. When it comes to environmental risk, energy emissions from CO2 are back at..."
- "Of course they aren't. These are scientific terms Hank Campbell and you can't just interpret them..."
- "The wealthiest are only formally most educated and, from both my personal expriences and reading..."
- "You think the marker assisted selection suddenly being endorsed by Greenpeace is not genetic modification..."
- Genetically modified clean energy from bacteria
- Designer babies: You can screen for cystic fibrosis but intelligence is a way off
- Science as profane: What superstition of 1752 and 2014 share in common
- What’s so “natural” about “natural crop breeding”?
- Worried you have cancer? Take a Google pill!
- Mars bars for brain health? Not so fast