Banner
    Neanderthals In Love? Four Stages Of Human Compassion Through Time
    By News Staff | October 6th 2010 04:02 AM | 8 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    New research by archaeologists from the University of York says that Neanderthals were a lot more compassionate than their reputation as brutish cavemen.

    How do you chart the 'compassion' of early humans?

    They examined archaeological evidence for the way in which emotions began to be seen in our ancestors six million years ago(!) and then developed from earliest times through Neanderthals and then to modern people like ourselves.   From that, they proposed a four stage model for the development of human compassion, beginning million of years ago when some common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees experienced the first signs of empathy for others and motivation to ‘help’ them, perhaps with a gesture of comfort or moving a branch to allow them to pass.

    The second stage in their model, 1.8 million years ago, sees compassion in Homo erectus beginning to be regulated as an emotion integrated with rational thought. Care of sick individuals represented an extensive compassionate investment while the emergence of special treatment of the dead suggested grief at the loss of a loved one and a desire to soothe others feelings.

    Then they say in Europe between around 500,000 and 40,000 years ago, early humans such as Homo heidelbergensis and Neanderthals developed deep-seated commitments to the welfare of others illustrated by a long adolescence and a dependence on hunting together. They say there is also archaeological evidence of the routine care of the injured or infirm over extended periods. These include the remains of a child with a congenital brain abnormality who was not abandoned but lived until five or six years old and those of a Neanderthal with a withered arm, deformed feet and blindness in one eye who must have been cared for, perhaps for as long as twenty years..

    In modern humans starting 120,000 years ago, compassion was extended to strangers, animals, objects and abstract concepts.

    Dr. Penny Spikins, who led the research, said that new research developments, such as neuro-imaging, have enabled archaeologists to attempt a scientific explanation of what were once intangible feelings of ancient humans. She added that this research was only the first step in a much needed prehistoric 'archeology of compassion', which sounds like it would be anthropology or psychology instead.

    “Compassion is perhaps the most fundamental human emotion. It binds us together and can inspire us but it is also fragile and elusive. This apparent fragility makes addressing the evidence for the development of compassion in our most ancient ancestors a unique challenge, yet the archaeological record has an important story to tell about the prehistory of compassion,” she said.  “We have traditionally paid a lot of attention to how early humans thought about each other, but it may well be time to pay rather more attention to whether or not they ‘cared’.”

    Spikins will give a free public lecture about the research at the University of York on Tuesday,  October 19th called "Neanderthals in love: What can archaeology tell us about the feelings of ancient humans" takes place in room P/L001, Department of Physics.

    They are publishing the study as a book The Prehistory of Compassion that is available to purchase online. All proceeds go to the charity World Vision.

    Citation: P A Spikins, H E Rutherford, A P Needham, 'From hominity to humanity: Compassion from the earliest archaic to modern humans', Time and Mind Volume 3, Number 3, November 2010 , pp. 303-325(23) DOI: 10.2752/175169610X12754030955977

    Comments

    rholley
    I think that the animation here features the Gogs.


    Robert H. Olley Quondam Physics Department University of Reading England
    Hank
    That animation is almost as funny as the claims by the researchers in the article.
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind
    rholley
    How do you find the claims so funny?  I find it quite interesting, but I've got two more things for Science 2.0 further along the pipeline (one polymer, one historical).




       Merch fach Neanderthal,

       o Wicipedia (Cymraeg).




    Robert H. Olley Quondam Physics Department University of Reading England
    Hank
    They examined archaeological evidence for the way in which emotions began to be seen in our ancestors six million years ago
    I call 'foul!' on the whole concept.
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind
    Aitch
    I just find the whole idea that cave-dwelling people were less compassionate and brutish, to be modern day analytical vanity...posing our superiority, yet again
    ....whilst compassion is being suppressed, as almost unnecessary for our 'logical development mindset'

    You can't kill the spirit!
    Hank
    I agree, the whole notion of progress being a linear path toward better is silly.   Like modern-day progressives, there is a certain amount of well-meaning elitism ('we are smarter than them') in it, though I don't see anything malicious in it.   I think the idea that there is archaeological 'evidence' of compassion from millions of years ago is blatantly mapping available evidence to the wishes of researchers.
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind
    Aitch
    The seesaw of confirmation bias in time, maybe?

    Aitch
    Hank
    No doubt.  Obviously the article is here so sometimes we put up stuff because it is interesting and kooky as opposed to interesting and solid science.   We just don't make a habit of it.   :)
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind