Liberal critics have always panned 1965's "The Sound of Music" as conservative and schmaltzy, a throwback to the 1950s during a decade that claimed to be about revolution and progress.
Yet the public loves it.
London academic Martin Gorsky has an explanation that critics seem to have missed: the film actually ‘helped constitute’ an understanding of society.
Gorsky explains that the film’s treatment of two contemporary issues - the importance of play and emotion in childrearing, and post-war perspectives of Fascism – were fundamental to the widespread popularity of the film.
Thus Maria’s energetic and involved governess/parenting is more than just a quirk of the script. The values of the 1960s can also be framed as being found in many of the characters’ relationships with authority figures; the film shows that “social organization based on fealty to the leader ends only in unhappiness. The antidote, love, can both transform the individual and rearrange the social, replacing obedience with collaboration.”
Gorsky concludes that what made ‘The Sound of Music’ so popular with contemporary audiences was the simple statement about love and peace at its core: “and what would be a more characteristically ‘Sixties’ message than that?”
Perhaps. Democrats found a way to give credit for Ronald Reagan bringing down the USSR and got "Charlie Wilson's War" made to try and prove it. So claiming that independent resistance to totalitarian big government is not a conservative belief but rather a liberal one is an easy sell in academia, especially among Baby Boomers obsessed with their own endless self regard.
The public isn't searching for a deeper meaning. It is just a good Rodgers and Hammerstein show about people who like to sing and wanted to escape the Nazis.
Citation: Martin Gorsky, '“Raindrops on roses:” The Sound of Music and the political psyche of the Sixties', The Sixties: A Journal of History, Politics and Culture , April 2014, DOI:10.1080/17541328.2014.886425
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Quantum mechanics in 1834?
- Why This New "Planet X" Is No Threat To Earth :).
- Would New Planet X Clear Its Orbit? - And Any Better Name Than "Planet Nine"?
- Native Americans Aren't More Prone To Alcoholism
- The Greenhouse Effect Fallacy
- Top Secret: On Confidentiality On Scientific Issues, Across The Ring And Across The Bedroom
- The Doctor-Less Hospital Future
- "Does the emitted photon from carbon dioxide have EXACTLY the same wavelength as the absorbed photon..."
- " from: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/12/02/history-falsifies-climate-alarmist-sea-level-claims/..."
- "Thanks, didn't know about those. But it could also be a shower of hail stones, using the wikipedia..."
- "Are you saying that the sea level data are wrong? I'm just quoting it. If so, please note your data...."
- "For a good place to start, concerning causality as it relates to physics and the mathematics of..."
- Native grass could be key to super-thin condoms
- Teaching neurons to respond to placebos as potential treatment for Parkinson's
- Fall in one-to-one nursing care of very sick newborns linked to higher death rate
- Starfish reveal the origins of brain messenger molecules
- Horses can read human emotions, University of Sussex research shows