Banner
    Why Do Only 10% Of Smokers Get Lung Cancer? Genetic Biomarker May Provide The Answer
    By News Staff | October 14th 2008 09:01 PM | 5 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    Yale Cancer Center researchers have identified a genetic biomarker that may help to determine why some people are at an increased risk of developing lung cancer.

    The findings, published in the journal Cancer Research, could help identify smokers who should be carefully screened for lung cancer.

    “Only 10% of smokers will develop lung cancer in their lifetime and genetic testing to determine the population of smokers who are most predisposed to develop the disease is needed to help guide better evaluation for these people,” explained Joanne B. Weidhaas, MD, PhD, assistant professor of therapeutic radiology at Yale School of Medicine and senior author on the study in collaboration with Frank Slack, PhD, associate professor in the department of molecular, cellular and developmental biology at Yale University.

    "We looked for the effects of genetic variations within a human oncogene known to be affected by tiny RNA molecules, called microRNAs,” said Slack. These variations called single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) predicted a significant increase in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) risk in non-smokers as well as people with a moderate smoking history.

    The study evaluated the prevalence of a SNP in people with lung cancer and compared this to findings in the general population. In patients with non-small cell lung cancer 20.3 percent carried the genetic alteration while 5.8 percent of the general population shared the same alteration. Based on two independent case control studies the findings show that the SNP does mark an increased risk of NSCLC.

    The work breaks new ground by identifying SNPs that disrupt microRNAs and act as biomarkers of increased cancer risk. “These findings will guide us as we look for similar SNPs in all tumor-related genes,” Weidhaas said.

    Other Yale University researchers included Lena Chin, Elana Ratner, Sunitha Nallur, Imran Babar, Roman-Ulrich Muller, Eva Straka, Rajeshvari Patel, Trupti Kulkarni, Robert Homer, Daniel Zelterman, and Kenneth Kidd, Yong Zu. Researchers from the Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute, Harvard School of Public Health, the University of New Mexico, and Harvard Medical School also contributed to the study.

    This research was funded through a grant from the Connecticut Department of Public Health’s Biomedical Research Trust Fund and the Shannon Foundation. The National Institutes of Health provided additional support.

    Citation: Cancer Research (October 15, 2008)

    Comments

    bulls-hit,I raised 2 kids around shs from birth to high school.All my freinds did too,this is nothing more than propaganda to keep the biggest lie ever told alive and running,especially during the election where the libs will push this to the limit and beyond,coopting peoples minds with lies deciet and hate,just to pursue a political agenda against the free rights of the people.....WELCOME TO THE LIBERAL/GREEN POLICE STATE OF 1984.

    Hank
    A genetic biomarker that may determine why not everyone who smokes gets lung cancer is liberal propaganda? I am not sure why you think that. If SNPs could vote, someone would have a commercial targeting them. But I bet they can't. P.S. Are we corporate shills for the right wing or militant atheists for the left? We get accused of both, so I think we are right where we need to be - in the middle.
    i hoe your right, tat it is bullshit. my dads mother died of lung cnacer at 40 plus and he is 59 and they just diagnosed hime last week with stage iv lung cnacer. btw - i jus quit smoking and i have a 13 month old baby. god - i hope your ignorant ass is right.

    stop kidding yourself and stopo blowing smoke in everyones orphices (esp your kids)

    seriously ppl stfu
    they wont post bs properganda, its funny how i know over 100 ppl who smokes, half of em since they were my age and now around 60, and not one of em has been diagnosed
    ive seen my doctor and he says aslong as i live a healthy lifestyle and eat right, i wont get the effects of cancer

    another thing u say that these ppl r lying when u know urself are bullshitting about how he gots cancer she got cancer i got cancer my friends got cancer, so for everyone who reads this and thinks ok fair enough, SHUT THE FUCK UP!

    Liberals are just as blind as Conservatives when it comes to examining new points a view it seems. I found this blog very interesting. I have been looking for a percentile of Smokers who contract Cancer ( specifically lung cancer) because the percentile in the media is those lung cancer patients who were smokers, which is relative to 90%. Thank you again for this blog, it has been helpful.

    Add a comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite><TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe><u><font>
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    CAPTCHA
    If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.