The argument on the side of "enhanced interrogation" techniques tends to come down to the practical: we need them because they work (i.e., they obtain information that could not be obtained in a usable time frame by other methods, which prevents attacks). If the claim is true, that would be a legitimate argument (). There are a number of ways to decided whether an interrogation method, whether enhanced or not, is valid and productive. The Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) method is not one of them. His method? Noting that there have been no major terrorist attacks in the United States since 11 September, 2009. While true, it does not establish a causative relationship between interrogation methods and prevention of terrorist attacks.
This is exactly the same reasoning used in the development of superstitions. I was wearing boxers nor briefs when I got my Western blot to work. Therefore, I always wear boxers when doing Western blots. Or, I wear pants and have never been struck by lightning. Therefore, pants prevent lightning strikes.
Even if you favor using water boarding and the like, don't use McConnell's argument. It just makes you look silly.
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Will China Dominate The Wine Industry Too?
- Family Holiday Survival: 12 Ways To Deal With That Climate Change Denier
- How Enzymes Work
- Falsifiability And The Integrity Of Physics
- The War on Weed is Over
- Spotted Gar Genome Confirms Ancient Relationship Between Fins And Hands
- Santa’s Naughty Or Nice List - An Unparalled Scale Of Big Data Analysis
- "Climate alarmist doomsters showed their hand when they switched from global warming to climate..."
- "And remember, True Global Warming believers get to use random weather events as PROOF of Global..."
- "You must be a socialist, you certainly are envious of others money and want it, and will justify..."
- "That's not science, it's math. ..."
- "Researchers have now shown that this 'wave-particle duality' is simply the quantum uncertainty..."