Banner
By Josh Witten | November 17th 2009 04:39 PM | 4 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
About Josh

Welcome to the home of the rugbyologist. Come along as I wander far and wide (and near, too), stop to smell the roses of intellectual fancy, and...

View Josh's Profile
Hubris is traditional defined as a man (or woman) acting as if they are the equal of the gods. This flavor of hubris has a tendency to piss off the gods, who know that humans are not the equals of the gods. The practitioner of the hubris also tends to come in for some serious smiting as a gentle reminder of their sub-god status. My favorite example is Bellerophon. the mythical Greek hero who slew the Chimera on his winged-steed Pegasus and then tried to ascend to the peak of Mount Olympus (gods-only private club) on said winged-beasty. To prevent such a transgression, he was smote by Zeus and brought into dramatic compliance with the law of gravity.

The uncanny valley? (Image from Wikipedia Commons)Here's a modern look at hubris, since a pantheon of gods is so BCE. Suzanne Somers nearly killed herself. She didn't know she was killing herself and still probably does not know. The details are a little sketchy, since she is the one telling the story, but here is what can be put together with some reasonable inferences. Suzanne was feeling icky. Hospitalized awful. Screening found spots that could be cancer or a fungal infection. Because such fungal infections almost never occur in people with functioning immune systems, cancer would have been the first diagnostic guess. Except that Somers was regularly using corticosteroids, an immune suppressant, as part of her strongly endorsed bioidentical hormone therapy. Fortunately, for her (jury is still out on the for us), her doctors discovered this fact, switched diagnoses, and successfully treated her fungal infection.

In summary, Somers regularly treats herself with corticosteroids suppressing her immune system and allowing her to catch a widespread fungal infection that nearly kills her if not for treatment by modern medicine. You can read the full description in her own words here.

So far, we are only looking at stupidity. It's not even hubristic to excoriate the doctors that may have saved your life for being jerks. No, hubris is not only writing a book giving medical advice to others after this nearly killing herself by following her own advice, but you can read the story of her unintentional and unacknowledged effort to kill herself in the very book in which she provides that medical advice.

Somers may like to think of herself as a tragic hero like Bellerophon fighting the Chimera of cancer and bravely challenging the hegemony of the Olympian oligarchs[1] of "Western Medicine". Unfortunately, Somers is more of a Hamlet[2], in the sense that being associated with Hamlet was a great way to end up dead.

Suzanne Somers, for your hubris and inflicting Step By Step on the world, we are pleased to welcome you to The Festival of Idiots.

NOTES
1: My personal favorite way of thinking of the Bellerophon story - the capable and deserving little guy being smacked down by the powerful elite jealously guarding their unearned position.
2: In the off-chance that an English lit major actually reads Scientific Blogging, I do know that Hamlet's tragic flaw was his dithering, not hubris.

*Hat tip to Orac at Respectful Insolence. Orac actually bothered to read Somers' book sparing me the effort of extracting her story and providing medically competent analysis, which I cannot do.


Comments

I've often wondered how being a T&A jiggle sitcom queen qualified a person to give medical advice.

jtwitten
Very simple. Oprah endorsed her. 

Although, it should be noted in cases like this and Jenny McCarthy that neither being attractive nor formal qualifications has anything to do with the validity of an argument. Those are both ad hominem arguments. It is true, however, that neither Somers, nor McCarthy has logic or evidence on their side.

On the other hand, the Science Cheerleader maintains a female and cheerleader biased list of attractive and scientifically literate individuals. They probably need more male nominees for this list, hint, hint.

I suppose pointing out the person isn't qualified to make a claim could be considered an ad hominem argument.

But, I think the lack of qualifications go directly to the quality of the arguement being advanced, and is really more an assessment of the probability and reasonableness of the arguement.

But, I suppose expecting education or other qualifications is a bad thing in this era of the Amateur Cult/Reality Show Show mentality.

We are certainly in a bizarre time when many would have us put all ideas on par with actual scientific theories.

I wonder when the Intelligent Falling people will start their lawsuits to be taught alongside gravity.

jtwitten
I agree that qualification is information that should be incorporated, but the number of bad doctors out there prove that qualifications alone cannot be used. The trust of expertise by the public is a thorny issue.

I do find that it does not strengthen the arguments on the side of science to take cheap shots at the proponents of woonackery for their undistinguished pasts (e.g., McCarthy posing nude or picking her nose on MTV). Her position is stupid not because she is stupid, but because it has not only no evidence, but the exact opposite of evidence.

 After all, some scientists have questionable pasts in disreputable fields like rugby and prostitution.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite><TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.