How do you know the paper claiming GMO toxicity is in a journal that isn't very reputable? They don't have $9 to renew their domain.
It seems like only yesterday (oh wait, it was) that I wrote about the latest Gilles-Eric Seralini Scud missile against science and all things evidence-based. Now RetractionWatch notes that the whole domain his disappeared - because the rigorous editors and management at something called the Scholarly Journal of Agricultural Sciences forgot to pay their bill.
This is their URL now:
That comes one day after his press conference to suggest that "GMO Bt maize is most probably toxic over the long term", mostly by taking harm in the realm of chance and elongating one axis to look important. I'd love to interview him about that but he won't return my calls. His co-author got thrown in jail for beating his wife so he's no help either.
Usually it takes a month or two before Seralini papers are retracted. This new journal just euthanized itself right away. Is that progress? You betcha.
Journal Publishing Seralini Paper Claiming GMO Toxicity Disappears Faster Than His Career
Related articles
- The Industry Funding Behind Anti-GMO Activist Gilles-Éric Séralini
- 700 Researchers Call On Gilles-Eric Seralini To Release GMO Test Data
- "It Was Not Designed As A Science Experiment"- Seralini Speaks Some Truth
- Conflict Of Interest? Ethics Debate Intensifies Over Retraction Of Flawed Séralini Rat Study
- Can The Damage From Agenda-Driven Junk Science Be Undone?
Comments