Spacetime
and time correction is a new topic that explains the dilemma of the parameter
time. In classical physics, time points often involve measures of t_{0}
(initial time) and t_{f} (final time). Mass, velocity, energy and time in
simple terms can be explained by a 2pi correction method.

To start,

<!--[if !supportLists]-->1) <!--[endif]-->sqrt(m)*c=D/T*(sqrt(m))

<!--[if !supportLists]-->2)
<!--[endif]-->Square
both sides and mc^{2 } ~ m*D^{2}/T^{2}

<!--[if !supportLists]-->3)
<!--[endif]-->Finally
mc^{2 }~ mc^{2}

While Einstein explained that time may be related to an inertia time frame and there is no absolute time frame and time can be a parameter. There are
simple relationships that are involved in *Time, Correction, Energy and Momentum *to begin with. The concept of proper time can be a useful concept
as well as Lorentz’s work with Einstein and the experiment at CERN and the
OPERA experiment stimulated research. From information regarding how much time
is involved to finish a 730.085 km journey for neutrinos, velocity may be measured
leading to discussions. The speed of neutrinos was shown that it was still below
the speed of light as Einstein suggested .With respect dark matter out numbers visible
matter 5 to 1 (Carroll 2011) which makes the proporties of dark matter more important.

**Time Correction Relationships**

V_{c} = (D) ÷ (T_{c})
where D = 2πr.

t = (2πr) ÷ (c)

v^{2} = (2πr)^{2} ÷ (t^{2})

v = (2πr) ÷ (t)

E = m × v^{2}

E_{c} = (m × (2πr)^{2})
÷ (t_{c}^{2})

**E _{c} = (m × (D)^{2}) ÷
(t_{c}^{2})**

**Proof**

The definition of time correction
can prove photoelectric effect. The parameters of time and λ by time correction
allows the proof of photoelectric effect and De Broglie relation to help demonstrate
that proof of E=mv^{2} and E_{ec}= m × D^{2} ÷ tc^{2}.
Time correction subsequently follows the equation of special relativity (potentially
not over all time).

E_{ec} = (m × (2πr)^{2})
÷ (tc^{2})

t ^{2} = (m (2πr) ^{2})
÷ (E)

t = √ ((htd) ÷ (λ) ÷ (hc) ÷ (λ))

(1) ÷ (c) =(P) ÷ (E)

E=mc^{2}

Likewise, momentum can also follow with this simple proof.

E_{ec} = (m × (πAB)^{2})
÷ (t_{c}^{2})

E_{ec} = mv^{2}

P= (E) ÷ (v)

P=mv

**Inverse Relationship
of Time and Velocity to Energy**

Angular momentum, or time correction, plotted results in an organized and stack image of energy. In addition, time is showing an inverse relation ship to energy (Agravat 2013) which is supported by the Kauffman, Bucherer, Neumann experiment explaing the E/m relationship is showing an increase for decrease in velocity (Hecht 2009).

**Hypergeometric Function**

The plot of a hypergeometric function in an infinite series, Agravat
series, is showing an decrease in velocity. One may infer than perhaps then the
decrease in velocity will result in an increase in energy due to hypergeometric
forces. The assumption may be that f(z) ~ c or speed and mass is ~ y in the
transformation of E=mc^{2}. The fifth Agravat series (Agravat 2011) is:

**Figure 1.** Agravat series and descending velocity function**Figure 2.** Kaufmann, Bucherer, and Neumann Experiment E/m vs velocity

Reference

[1] Agravat, Manoj B MPH (A). Time Correction, Energy and
Momentum . *Science Journal of Physics*. Volume 2012,Article ID sjp-111,
13 Pages, 2012. doi: 10.7237/sjp.

[2] Agravat, Manoj B MPH , New Methods for time Correction of Energy, Momentum, and Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, Asian Journal of Science and Technology , Vol. 4, Issue 5, Pages 59-66, 2013 , http://journalajst.com/sites/default/files/1214.pdf .

[3] Hecht, Eugene. Einstein on Mass and Energy. American Journal of Physics (77):9. September 2009.

[4] Carroll, Sean. Faster than Light Neutrinos (2011).

[5] Special Relativity http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/

[6] Agravat, Manoj B MPH , New Time Dilation, Time Correction, Photoelectric Effect, De Broglie Equation, and Hypotenuse Axiom Method. Asian Journal of Science and Technology,2014

http://www.journalajst.com/sites/default/files/Download%201465.pdf

Science2.0 has done okay keeping these infrequent, but this one clearly slipped through. It is even on the "Top Articles" list, which is a shame. Can someone delete this junk? Or if you are really opposed to deleting, at least move it to the culture -> random thoughts ?