We like to make fun of pseudoscience, mostly because it is hypocritical. It simultaneously says real science is insular and close-minded and BIG and therefore resistant to awesome new ideas, like there being ghosts in my attic(1), but wants science legitimacy so uses faux-science techniques and then maps the data to the topology they want to achieve, like 'this must be a ghost.'
And it's fairly common bad logic in many programs. Watching an episode of "Stan Lee's Superhumans" last night I watched as the investigator (what, you think Stan Lee is flying all over the world? He created the Fantastic Four, he gets to put his name on something and that is that) went to England to see if a gent could foresee the future. His reasoning was "Since science hasn't disproved it" this fortune-telling was entirely possible, which made me chuckle, but I was only waiting for the guy who could climb up walls like a monkey anyway so I played MLB: The Show 2010 on my PSP and let him have his way with reality as some guy wrote down vague Nostradamus-like images (the test: where they would drive to the next morning) and then the host did mental backflips proving ways where they might be related to the place the ended up. It was worthy of any psychic but not proof of anything.
The monkey-climbing man is Jyothi Rai. He's pretty cool but doesn't claim to use magic or psychic powers to do it. Hope your Hindi is up to snuff.
And in "Ghost Lab" a group of real-life Ghostbusters get teary-eyed because they want to believe some waveform filtered noise is John Wilkes Booth.
Please donate so experts can write for the public.
Science 2.0 is a science journalism nonprofit operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. You can make a difference with a tax-deductible donation. If you value independent science communication, collaboration & participation, please help.