Aschner and Ceccatelli first discuss all the possible exposures to mercury that occur in the environment. There's a lot of potential exposures to mercury, with fish being the primary exposure to methylmercury.
Of interest is this paragraph:
"The incidents in Japan and Iraq revealed the particularly devastating neurotoxic effects of MeHg on the developing nervous system. Lately, also exposure to much lower level of MeHg from dietary sources was shown to have unfavorable neurodevelopmental effects as reported by prospective studies of populations in the Faroe Islands and New Zealand (Kjellstrom et al. 1989; Grandjean et al. 1997). Recent studies point to the critical role that maternal diet can play in the onset of MeHg developmental neurotoxicity (Davidson et al. 2008)." (Aschner and Ceccatelli)
It makes almost no sense on a practical level for parents to be raging against thimerosal while ignoring the reality that their children's exposure to methylmercury is far more pervasive.
Aschner and Ceccatelli note that thimerosal was removed from vaccines under the assumption that toxicity would be similar to methylmercury exposure, but that since that removal, "it has been shown that the kinetics of tissues disposition and metabolism differ from those for MeHg." They continue: "While the scientific literature supports the concept that MeHg is a potent developmental neurotoxin, the assertion that thimerosal leads to developmental disorders in children is hypothetical and unsubstantiated, resting on indirect and incomplete information, primarily from analogies with MeHg."
As a purely precautionary action, reducing thimerosal exposure made practical sense while conducting studies to look at the potential for neurotoxicity. Unfortunately, we know that those who latched onto thimerosal as a potential cause of autism, have used this cautionary act as proof that the government and pharma knew it was a problem. It's evident from careful and exhaustive reading of parents who buy into the vaccine causation theory that facts and evidence aren't necessary for this belief system to maintain itself more fervently over time and as each potential theory is shot down.
Safety studies on thimerosal have now been conducted. So have studies looking at autism rates as thimerosal was removed from vaccines. Aschner and Ceccatelli conclude from these studies: "Simply stated, MeHg is not a suitable reference for evaluating ethylmercury toxicity. Key observations to substantiate this statement include the following: (1) mercury clears from the body much faster after the administration of ethylmercury than after the administration of MeHg; (2) the brain-to-blood mercury concentration ratio established for MeHg will overestimate mercury in the brain after exposure to ethylmercury; and (3) because ethylmercury decomposes much faster than MeHg, the risk of brain damage is less for ethylmercury than for MeHg."
Aschner and Ceccatelli even spend a fair amount of time reviewing Burbacher's study on monkeys that the anti-vaccine folks love to trot out. Hornig's mice study is also reviewed. If the anti-vaccine folks were about scientific evidence, then they'd have to embrace the conclusions that Aschner and Ceccatelli come to, but anyone who's spent time reading those who embrace autism as vaccine injury knows once they're aware of Aschner and Ceccatelli's literature review, they'll be quick to reject it, especially since the conclusion of the literature review on thimerosal and autism is: "Methodologically sound and rigorous epidemiological
studies have largely failed in finding a significant correlation between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism. However, efforts to reduce the exposure of infants, children, and pregnant women to any form of mercury from various sources should continue."
Aschner, M.,&Ceccatelli, S. (2009). Are Neuropathological Conditions Relevant to Ethylmercury Exposure? Neurotoxicity Research, 18 (1), 59-68 DOI: 10.1007/s12640-009-9113-2