This life-world also allows for the formation (organisation) of order, and a methodology of complexity should offer some assistance in the recognition of these orderly phenomena. PAC uses a pattern-orientation to 'make sense' of this life-world, and this sense is one of many other scientific methodologies that take this approach.
Patterns were pioneerd in the 1970's by the Austrian-British architect Christopher Alexander, who saw certain regularities in the various (medeaval) towns he visited and realised that many of regularities 'made sense'. A town square, for instance, had a number of functions, and a good designed town square facilitated these functions optimally. As a result, (well-designed) town squares of different cities would tend to have certain similarities, which Alexander dubbed 'patterns'. But these patterns were not restricted to town squares alone, for any well-designed public meeting place would share patterns with this aspect of a town square. Hence, the underlying pattern is 'A Place to Wait'. Alexander collected well over 250 patterns in the pattern library that he described in his seminal book A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction, which is still considered a 'must-read' in building architecture.
In 1987 this idea was taken over for software architecture by Kent Beck and Ward Cunningham, and was hyped by the extremely popular book
The success of patterns has resulted in many attempts to apply these ideas in other areas, but as a methodological construct, it is a bit problematic that the notion of pattern is usually only used in a colloquial sense. There is no real 'metaphysics of patterns' so to speak. With the help of a, for me, very important article by Volker Grimm and his colleagues in Science Magazine, I tried to fill in some of the gaps, and came to the following conclusions:
- You can speak of 'patterns' when they can be observed in various situations (duh)
- They are substrate -neutral, which means that they express themselves in different media
- Patterns have a structure.
- Patterns are building blocks; new patterns can be assembled from simpler ones
- Simple patterns express themselves more widely than complex ones, and in a larger amount of different media. Mathematics can be seen as a collection of patterns that have a wide applicability.
- They are vaguely familiar phenomenon
- They can express themselves differently in different media
But these forms take place in interaction with a lot of other conceptual patterns, which deforms them, stretches and tears them, so 'formation' always takes place in a contingent environment. However, some patterns are sufficiently robust that they create stable forms. Especially patterns that create their own contexts -basically they feed back onto themselves- can create very stable forms. So a pattern library of complexity should include quite a number of such robust self-referential patterns.