Why linguistics attract so much nonsense is because these “crackpots” are not linguists, according to a linguist.
Scholars of yore, when reflecting upon language, would wonder things such as: which of the contemporary languages was spoken by the first man? Which one is superior to the rest? And which of the human tongues deserves the label ‘divine’? Modern linguists will not touch those with a 10-foot pole.
Given the extensive body of historical knowledge collected since, one would expect that claims of Goropian and Rudbeckian absurdity would be a thing of the past.
That would be wrong, writes Gaston Dorren at Aeon.
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
Apply for a column: email@example.com
- The Natural History of High Blood Pressure
- American Air Is Clean and Getting Cleaner
- College Students' Sleep Article Proves Much More Popular Online
- 'ACSH is Fake News!' So Says Anti-Vax, Conspiracy-Loving Screwball
- ACSH Explains: What's The Story On Cyclic Aliphatic Bromides Cluster (HBCD)?
- The Toll of Diabetes
Donate or Buy SWAG
- Peering Into The Void: Cosmic Web Reveals This Part Of The Early Universe Had Almost No Matter!
- The Silence On BPA Is Deafening – Let The CLARITY Data Speak!
- Statistics Gone Wild: Secondhand Smoke Causes Arthritis 30 Years Later, Says Questionnaire Result
- HBO No: John Oliver's Awkward Support For The Anti-Vaccine Community
- Guest Post: Alessandro De Angelis, Multi-Messenger Astrophysics
- Do Any Supplements Work For A Cold?
- Young Religious Americans Care About The Environment, Because Religious Leaders Have Avoided Activist Politics