The fossil is very small for these hominin groups and suggest that its cerebral morphology does not present any traits distinctive to the human genus: its proportions are similar to those of australopiths or species whose evolutionary position, and whether they are from our own lineage, remains to be determined, as is the case with H. habilis.
This analysis confirms that there is still no evidence of a clear boundary for the origin of brain anatomy in the human genus, at least in view of the current fossil record. Most of the differences in brain anatomy between the earliest human species, and indeed even when humans and australopiths are compared, are basically associated to differences in the average size of the encephalon.
The difficulty in finding brain traits associated to the evolution of the genus Homo, other than size, might arise out of the absence of macroscopic differences in the cortex, the limitations of the fossil samples, or how hard it is to interpret the morphology of the brain from the internal traces left on the cranium.
“Naturally, this does not preclude the possibility that the origin of the human brain might be related to changes that cannot be detected in the overall anatomy, such as the changes that occur at the level of cells and tissues, neural connections, or neurotransmitters”, says Emiliano Bruner from the Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana.
Citation: Bruner, E., Holloway, R., Baab, K. L., Rogers, M. J.,&Semaw, S. (2023). The endocast from Dana Aoule North (DAN5/P1): A 1.5 million year-old human braincase from Gona, Afar, Ethiopia. American Journal of Biological Anthropology, 1– 10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24717
- Homo Erectus And Brain Size- The Hole Story
- Is Australopithecus Sediba The Best Candidate Ancestor To Our Species?
- Smarter Throughout History? New Fossil Says No (Ancient Humans Were Big-Headed Too!)
- A Revised Timeline Of Human Origins?
- Dmanisi Skull: Homo Habilis, Homo Erectus Belonged To The Same Species- Study