Health costs saved or gained, like all claims about what did not happen, are made-up metrics, so we can either accept or not accept the notion that 4 million criminals are now going to have free health care and that will cost us less money than if they didn't have health care and that caused them to commit more crimes and then get health care.

Politicians coming up on a mid-term election have to take their health reform victories where they can get them and the work led by Marsha Regenstein, PhD, who is a professor of health policy at
the George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services (SPHHS)
, may seem like a bit of a stretch but it has a kernel of truth - prisoners get better health care than poor Americans so if they never get health care and they go to jail, they will cost taxpayers more once they get it.

Jail is not mean to connote prison, we all know prisoners get free health care and cable television. Jails, unlike prisons, typically house offenders who have been detained or arrested for misdemeanors or nonviolent crimes. People who are mentally ill, have substance use problems or are homeless and picked up may be sent to jail for a short period of time and then released back into the community. 

"Health reform gives people with a history of jail time access to continuous health care for the first time ever," said Regenstein in their statement. "The hope is that such coverage will help keep individuals and entire communities healthier and reduce the nation's health care costs." 

Without follow-up care or treatment they are at risk of another arrest and the cycle repeats, according to the authors. 

Counties, cities and other localities operate more than 3,200 jails across the nation and they are responsible for providing some level of health care to inmates while they are incarcerated. "The Affordable Care Act doesn't change that responsibility but it does mean that many in the jail population will be able to get health coverage before and after time spent in the local jail," said co-author Sara Rosenbaum, JD, the Harold and Jane Hirsh Professor of Health Law and Policy at SPHHS.

Under the Affordable Care Act, people with a history of a jail stay may be eligible for Medicaid coverage upon release, particularly if they live in a state that has opted to expand its Medicaid program. 

According to the analysis over 16 percent of people expected to enroll in Medicaid under the new state expansion programs will have spent some time in jail during the past year. To date, 25 states and the District of Columbia have expanded Medicaid programs to cover more of the low-income population.

And this report says another 10 percent people enrolling in health plans under the insurance Marketplaces will have a history of a recent jail stay. Under the ACA, people who are poor but still do not qualify for Medicaid can often purchase a health plan by going to the online insurance Marketplaces. 

The promise of continuous coverage would mean that people with serious mental illness or substance abuse might get medication and treatment that would help them stay off the streets—and possibly out of situations leading to an arrest in the future. About 64 percent of people incarcerated in jails meet the criteria for mental illness at the time of their booking and the same high number have problems related to alcohol or drug abuse, the authors note.

But such positive outcomes can be expected only if community jails, insurers, and health care providers work together to coordinate services so that people coming out of jails can sign up for Medicaid or a qualified health plan and then get an appointment quickly at the local clinic or health care provider, Regenstein said.

In some cases, jails identify chronic health problems and provide health care for inmates. But they rarely connect with or have ties to providers in the community, Regenstein says. Without those ties and the resulting treatment inmates can be released with an infectious disease or health problem that goes unaddressed and then worsens or even spreads to others.

While most jails still rely on paper records, the use of electronic information exchanges could help ensure a healthy and smooth transition to the community, the authors contend. Such electronic health records could follow the patient once they are released or vice versa. Providers in jail or in the community could then follow-up on a patient's chronic condition such as diabetes or asthma and ensure that medications or treatments are available before, during or after a jail stay.

Finally, jails are realizing they must work closely with Medicaid offices and health insurance navigators in order to identify and enroll people who qualify for health plans. The challenge is that jails have limited staff or resources for this kind of outreach, the authors said. There are also many logistical barriers that make it hard for jail inmates to produce the kind of documentation they need to qualify for and enroll in a new health plan.

The authors conclude that the opportunities offered by the ACA for this population outweigh any barriers and could benefit not just individuals but entire communities. "Enrolling people who are to be released from jail will require substantial effort and resources," says Rosenbaum. "However, this investment will pay off in terms of better health, reduced costs and possibly the reduced risk of additional jail time."

 Upcoming in the March issue of Health Affairs.