COLUMBUS, Ohio - Nearly everybody thinks that presidential candidates routinely dodge hard-hitting questions, providing evasive answers to simple questions.
But a new study that analyzed the full transcripts of 14 U.S. presidential debates from 1996 to 2012 provides some surprising insights that might temper that belief -- and help explain why people believe politicians are evasive.
The research found that presidential candidates accused their rivals of evasion quite often -- 54 times in the 14 debates analyzed.
But rivals were actually guilty of some form of evasion no more than 35 percent of the time that they were accused, the study found.