Banner
    More Bad News: Nanoparticles Help Bacteria To Become Superbugs
    By Sascha Vongehr | March 13th 2012 11:01 PM | 4 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    About Sascha

    Dr. Sascha Vongehr [风洒沙] studied phil/math/chem/phys in Germany, obtained a BSc in theoretical physics (electro-mag) & MSc (stringtheory)...

    View Sascha's Profile

    You may have heard about certain potential dangers of nanotechnology; I like to write about some of them on occasion; and you probably know about the almost lost battle against so called superbugs, those pesky bacteria that evolved in hospitals to become resistant against all our drugs. Now combine these for something a little more scary: Fast-track evolution towards superbugs.


    Nanoparticles accelerate horizontal gene transfer between bacteria, helping them to become resistant against multiple antibiotics. Especially the alumina nanoparticles used to bind heavy metals in waste water treatment plants have now been shown to invade the cells readily through the cell membrane. Such invasions seem to quite generally trigger bacteria to approach other microorganisms in order to swap genes, which is a way to accelerate adaptation in a rapidly changing environment.



    As Zhigang Qiu et. al. now describe in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences [1], the transfer of genes can increase by up to 200 times, helping diseases to acquire resistance against antibiotics from our harmless gut bacteria in waste water. The particles even help the exchange between types of organisms that usually seldom swap genes, like between Escherichia Coli and Salmonella.


    “Antibiotic resistance is a worldwide public health concern. Conjugative transfer between closely related strains or species of bacteria is an important method for the horizontal transfer of multidrug-resistance genes. The extent to which nanomaterials are able to cause an increase in antibiotic resistance by the regulation of the conjugative transfer of antibiotic-resistance genes in bacteria, especially across genera, is still unknown. Here we show that nanomaterials in water can significantly promote the horizontal conjugative transfer of multidrug-resistance genes” Source: abstract [1]


    Escherichia Coli


    The concentration of nanoparticles used in the experiments was lower than that employed in novel waste water treatment test projects. Such is worrisome, but one could of course also give this a positive spin: At least bacteria are ready for the threat that nanotechnology poses. Triggered by cell stress, certain genes are activated and the microorganisms start evolving faster. It won’t help us much, but hey, let’s not be anthropocentric bio-racists. ;-)

    -------------------

    [1] Qiu et al: “Nanoalumina promotes the horizontal transfer of multiresistance genes mediated by plasmids across genera” PNAS pdf

    --------------------------------------------

    More from Sascha Vongehr sorted Topic for Topic

    Comments

    UvaE
    Especially the alumina nanoparticles used to bind heavy metals in waste water treatment plants have now been shown to invade the cells readily through the cell membrane....
    As Zhigang Qiu et. al. now describe in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences [1], the transfer of genes can increase by up to 200 times, helping diseases to acquire resistance against antibiotics from our harmless gut bacteria in waste water.

    Wow, another unpredicted consequence of what seemed like a thoroughly beneficial technique---but it also puts a serious dent into the hypothesis that bacterial resistance was solely the result of antibiotic use in farm animals.
    Gerhard Adam
    Wow, another unpredicted consequence of what seemed like a thoroughly beneficial technique...
    I'm not picking on you, Enrico, but this phrase seemed to capture the essence of the problem, as I see it.  Despite everything we've learned about biology, we understand very little of how things actually work.  We tend to view things mechanistically instead of recognizing that there are literally millions of independent processes running over which we exercise no control. 

    Couple that with our anthropocentric views of what is "beneficial" and we begin to see the problem.  If there is any "universal truth" that emerges from examining the biosphere its that radical imbalances are not tolerated for long.  One cannot arbitrarily 'stack the deck' in any particular direction.  So why humans are so busy trying to gain the advantage for their own continued growth, the rest of the biosphere also derives "benefit" from what we do, and it may do so at much more efficient levels that we are capable of.

    In short ... everything we do results in unpredicted consequences, because we understand little of what we are affecting.  We focus on one or two things when thousands are likely involved.
    UvaE
    I'm not picking on you, Enrico, but this phrase seemed to capture the essence of the problem, as I see it.  Despite everything we've learned about biology, we understand very little of how things actually work...

    In short ... everything we do results in unpredicted consequences, because we understand little of what we are affecting.  We focus on one or two things when thousands are likely involved.
    Don't worry Gerhard; I don't feel picked on. Believe it or not, I anticipated your response, and I do agree with you.
    Hfarmer
    I agree totally with this.   Even if we can understand the discrete parts knowing how these parts interact in real time and over time is something else.  
    Science advances as much by mistakes as by plans.