A wise man once said Darwin had the greatest idea anyone ever had. Others may prefer Newton or Archimedes. Probably no one ever said the WWW or Science 2.0® was the greatest idea anyone ever had, but revolutionizing the way scientists communicate, participate, collaborate and publish is at least a good idea.
Science 2.0 ® is a work in progress so sign up and help.
My first book, Science Left Behind, has gotten strong reviews:
Wall Street Journal - “usefully revealing how pervasive scientific misinformation is in progressive arguments on organic and genetically modified foods, clean energy, nuclear waste and other matters.”
Scientific American - “...the left's sacred values seem fixated on the environment, leading to an almost religious fervor over the purity and sanctity of air, water and especially food. Try having a conversation with a liberal progressive about GMOs — genetically modified organisms — in which the words “Monsanto” and “profit” are not dropped like syllogistic bombs.”
Michael Medved, nationally syndicated talk radio host, author of THE 10 BIG LIES ABOUT AMERICA - “Entertaining, enlightening and important. This valuable book should shatter the left's smug certainty that science registers as a partisan Democrat."
Forbes - “on many of the most critical issues of our time, the “progressive” perspective is often rooted in out-dated, anti-empirical, junk science paradigms that threaten innovation—and are beginning to unnerve the most scientifically minded thinkers on the left."
Huntington News - "Groundbreaking…If I were teaching journalism, this is a book that I would require my students to read and absorb -- and keep for reference.”
San Francisco Book Review - “Berezow and Campbell offer numerous examples of progressives hijacking legitimate programs and research and twisting them to suit a backwards-ass anti-science agenda. In this way, reading Science Left Behind is as infuriating as it is eye-opening.”
Science Based Medicine - "pure music to the ears of science-based medicine. They agree that the anti-vaccine movement is based on outright lies, they call the Huffington Post a laughingstock of the scientific community for its endorsement of CAM, they call for the NCCAM to be abolished, [and] they explain why presenting data about relative risks rather than absolute risks is misleading."
 | |
I have also written pieces for USA Today, Wired, New Scientist, CNN, Forbes, LA Times and more. Below are various other places to reach me.
Science 2.0
