Banner
Placebo Buttons?

A recent article suggested that many of the buttons/toggles that we experience in our daily lives...

The Development Of Social Monogamy In Mammals

Two papers published this week have proposed explanations regarding the evolution of social monogamy...

Easy Answers To World Problems

After reading another article by Alex Berezow ["The Arrogance of a Well-Fed Society"] insisting...

The Precautionary Principle Review

There is an interesting series of articles published by the Guardian discussing various aspects...

User picture.
picture for Fred Phillipspicture for Heidi Hendersonpicture for Quentin Rowepicture for Camillo Di Ciccopicture for Robert H Olleypicture for Brian Taylor
Gerhard AdamRSS Feed of this column.

I'm not big on writing things about myself so a friend on this site (Brian Taylor) opted to put a few sentences together: Hopefully I'll be able to live up to his claims. "I thought perhaps you... Read More »

Blogroll
It is obvious that life is filled with choices and we often go to great lengths to explore different possible outcomes or scenarios when attempting to make decisions.  However what is choice and how does it relate to free will?

It would seem that choices may be divided up into several categories, but in particular we have those that are:

1.  Direct choices, or command decisions where we intentionally make a determination about a particular outcome, perhaps after weighing options.
One of the favorite themes in transhumanist discussions is considering the melding of human intellect with "machine intelligence" to arrive at superhuman abilities.  

Right from the beginning we have a few problems.  We don't really know what human intelligence is and we aren't capable of building intelligent machines.  However, lest that obstacle prevent us from moving forward, let's consider what such a thing really means.
I've been trying to figure out why "transhumanists" and their predictions irritate me so much.  Perhaps it's seeing humanity reduced to a simplistic engineering problem to be solved.  Or maybe it's the love affair that appears to be happening between them and technology.  Or maybe it's the fact that they all sound like psychics, except that their subject is the human race instead of an individual. Back in July, Massimo Pigliucci addressed some of the problems with transhumanism, however it seems that this is a rather persistent idea.
OK, I'm just going to say it.  Where was law enforcement?

We have a registered sex offender, we have a neighbor reporting children on the property in November 2006, we have a parole violation in 1993 .... I guess the question is what does someone have to do to get law enforcement to pay attention?

I've already heard the laments about how overworked the parole officers were, although what they were doing for 18 years requires a bit more explanation.
A recent article on LiveScience asks "What Makes a Psychopath?  Answers Remain Elusive".  While the paper focuses on various aspects of brain function in determining what makes a psychopath, there is another more philosophical question that can be asked.

When we consider the questions of "individualism" and "collectivism", or for less politically charged words, the idea of social animals (including humans).  It brings into certain focus the question of the role that natural selection may play in predisposing individuals to be cooperative or not.
Finally an article that blasts the preposterous mythology suggesting that human longevity is a relatively recent phenomenon and primarily due to advances in medical technology.
http://www.livescience.com/health/090821-human-lifespans.html
In reviewing some of the comments made to the article it is clear that there is still a great deal of confusion surrounding the difference between "expectancy" and "lifespan".  The basic point in the article is that human life span is fundamentally unchanged over 2,000 years and quite possibly for a much longer period before that.