Thanks to athletes like Ryan Braun and Lance Armstrong, doping has gotten a bad rap, but if solar power is ever going to be viable, doping will be essential.
Flexible thin film solar cells require fewer materials and can be manufactured in large quantities by roll-to-roll processing. One such technology relies on cadmium telluride (CdTe), which is a distant second to silicon-based solar cells but cheap in terms of production costs. Because they are grown on rigid glass plates, these superstrate cells have, however a big drawback: they require a transparent supporting material that lets sunlight pass through to reach the light-harvesting CdTe layer, thus limiting the choice of carriers to transparent materials.
The inversion of the solar cell's multi-layer structure – the substrate configuration – would allow further cost-cuttings by using flexible foils made of, say, metal as supporting material. Sunlight now enters the cell from the other side, without having to pass through the supporting substrate.
The problem is that CdTe cells in substrate configuration on metal foil have low efficiencies, well below 8 percent and nowhere close to the record efficiency of 19.6 percent for a lab-scale superstrate CdTe cell on glass. Commercially available CdTe superstrate modules can reach efficiencies of between 11 and 12 percent.
Copper doping for solar cells
One way to increase the low energy conversion efficiency of substrate CdTe cells is p-type doping of the semiconductor layer with minute amounts of metals such as copper (Cu). This would lead to an increase in the density of "holes" (positive charge carriers) as well as their lifetimes, and thus result in a high photovoltaic power, the amount of sunlight that is turned into electrical energy. A perfect idea – if CdTe weren't so notoriously hard to dope.
"People have tried to dope CdTe cells in substrate configuration before but failed time and again," explains Ayodhya Nath Tiwari, head of Empa's laboratory for Thin Films and Photovoltaics.
His team decided to try nonetheless using high-vacuum Cu evaporation onto the CdTe layer with a subsequent heat treatment to allow the Cu atoms to penetrate into the CdTe. They soon realized that the amount of Cu had to be painstakingly controlled: if they used too little, the efficiency wouldn't improve much; the very same happened if they "over-doped."
The electronic properties improved significantly, however, when Lukas Kranz, a PhD student in Tiwari's lab, together with Christina Gretener and Julian Perrenoud fine-tuned the amount of Cu evaporation so that a mono-atomic layer of Cu would be deposited on the CdTe. "Efficiencies increased dramatically, from just under one percent to above 12," says Kranz.
Their best value was 13.6 percent for a CdTe cell grown on glass; on metal foils Tiwari's team reached efficiencies up to 11.5 percent.
For now, the highest efficiencies of flexible CdTe solar cells on metal foil are still somewhat lower than those of flexible solar cells in superstrate configuration on a special (and expensive) transparent polyimide foil, developed by Tiwari's team in 2011.
But, says co-author Stephan Buecheler, "Our results indicate that the substrate configuration technology has a great potential for improving the efficiency even further in the future." Their short-term goal is to reach 15 percent "but I'm convinced that the material has the potential for efficiencies exceeding 20 percent."
The next steps will focus on decreasing the thickness of the so-called window layer above the CdTe, including the electrical front contact. This would reduce light absorption and, therefore, allow more sunlight to be harvested by the CdTe layer.
"Cutting the optical losses" is how Tiwari calls it.