The Scientization of Politics happens, that's what. Scientization of Politics is the flipside of the more commonly known Politicization of Science. Politicization of Science is obvious - as the federal government in America has taken more control of science funding they have taken more control of the nature of research and politics guides its goals - George Bush limiting federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research and Barack Obama outright refusing to fund somatic cell nuclear transfer are examples. When science conflicts with politics, science gets mired in bureaucracy and committee meetings. Democrats in Congress railing against the CDC for not agreeing that vaccines cause autism is an example.
The Scientization of Politics is a different animal. It's making a political decision and wrapping it in the flag of science. In the case of Yucca Mountain, 100 miles from civilization in what can only be considered the ideal location for 65,000 metric tons of waste, the scientization of politics was to throw out decades of research and appoint a new 'blue ribbon' commission that is designed to reach the conclusion Pres. Obama and Senator Harry Reid of Nevada wanted them to reach - and they would keep on 'studying' the science issues until that happened.
But more scientifically-minded members of Congress are not letting it go so easily. Representative John Shimkus of Illinois said yesterday, “We will not move on any nuclear-waste provision without a Yucca Mountain component.”
Especially with the Department of Energy holding the nuclear industry hostage for almost a billion dollars per year in storage costs for a hundred sites, the cost of which is passed along to consumers.
Reid, of course, is famous for hostage-taking of his own. He held President Bush hostage until he placed Reid's anti-science staffer on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. He then got President Obama to make that anti-nuclear power zealot the head of the NRC, to disastrous effect. When he finally left, the president appointed a new NRC head who isn't even a nuclear physicist, but whose primary credentials were writing a book against Yucca Mountain.
These people think having nuclear waste in over a hundred different old locations is better than having it in one state-of-the-art, thoroughly scrutinized spot. It's like they want there to be a disaster - they hate nuclear energy more than they love America.
"Yucca Mountain will be there long after Senator Reid is gone,” Shimkus, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee panel on environment and the economy, said at a Bloomberg Government conference in Washington.
Meanwhile, rumblings are that nuclear physicist Ernest Moniz, one of President Obama's science and energy advisers, may be the next Energy Secretary, to replace Steven Chu. He was undersecretary at the Energy Department during the Clinton administration, so he helped oversee the dismantling of our nuclear energy industry, and was put on Obama's Blue Ribbon panel to find an "alternative" to the already scientifically validated Yucca Mountain, so he knows how to place politics properly before science when it counts, but at least he does not have the irrational CO2 hatred and rose-colored glasses approach to solar power that Chu has.
Moniz isn't the perfect choice, but as I noted in Energy Secretary Steven Chu Has Resigned - Here Are 3 Things We Need In The Next One, even 1 out of 3 would be better than what exists today.
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission- Scientization Of Politics About To Go From Bad To Worse
- Yucca Mountain: The 'Scientization' Of Politics
- What Won't Fix Our Nuclear Waste Issue- Another Government Agency
- Court Orders NRC And Obama Administration To Process Yucca Mountain License
- The Future Of Nuclear Energy May Be A Battery