This is an almost verbatim copy of a press release from the London Centre for nanotechnology.
When Watson, Crick and Wilkins discovered the DNA double helix nearly sixty years ago, they based their structure on an X-ray diffraction image (courtesy of Franklin) averaged over millions of DNA molecules (derived from squid sperm, I understand). Though the double helix has become iconic for our molecular-scale understanding of life, thus far no-one has ever “seen” the double helix of an individual double-stranded DNA in its natural environment, i.e, salty water.
Dr Carl Leung and a team of international collaborators led by Dr Bart Hoogenboom at the London Centre for Nanotechnology (LCN) have now done just that. To visualise DNA, they used a technique called atomic force microscopy (AFM) that detects the molecules by ‘feeling’ them, as a blind person would with a cane. (Nice one! Especially to us folks that are used to seeing things “properly” with light or electrons.) Atomic force microscopy is known for its ability to achieve up to atomic resolution on flat surfaces, but often struggles to resolve more complex structures such as biological molecules. Imaging DNA, for instance, is analogous to using a cane to visualise a wriggling snake: not an easy task!
To resolve the double helix, the researchers miniaturised the cane (the “cantilever”) to approximately 10 microns length (an eighth of the width of a human hair) and nanometre-scale thickness. Next, they made it vibrate at sub-nanometre amplitudes and detected the proximity of the DNA via minute changes in the resonance frequency of the cantilever.
(The cantilever is the grey thing coming in from the left, I understand the thing pointing down on the cantilever is a laser beam which measures its deflection.)
The resulting images show the two strands of the double helix twisting around the central axis of the molecule, in a clockwise, right-handed fashion, similar to a corkscrew entering a cork. The so-called major groove is clearly resolved, separating the turns of the double helix, as well as the minor groove that separates the two strands of the double helix. This level of detail sets these images apart from all other AFM measurements on DNA over the past two decades.
Interestingly, the reported method also enabled the researchers to identify and probe a surprising form of DNA that has a left-handed structure, as opposed to the canonical right-handed structure. In future this method could therefore be used to study structural deviations of the double helix, linked to genetic instability and hereditary disease.
Full details and images have been published in the journal Nano Letters: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nl301857p
(Front page image:
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Why Do Spacecraft Like ESA's Schiaperelli Crash On Mars So Easily?
- BPA-Free, With Regrets
- New President - Pivot To Moon On Way To Mars? Lunar Spelunking & Science Surprises
- A Dimuon Particle At 30 GeV In ALEPH ??
- President Obama, Why Humans On Mars Right Now Are Bad For Science
- Biofuels Are A Climate Mistake
- Who Is Trying To Destroy The Internet?
- "For years I've been telling a friend of mine who is diabetic to stop drinking diet soda. He starts..."
- "Instead of the original article - the comments of Chandra Kant Raju are here..."
- "Good points indeed. But I think what the ESA did this time is unusual, so unusual, I don't think..."
- "I agree with most of what you say, but I don't think it's accurate to say that there isn't a statistically..."
- "Oh, you mean things like this?Sunset photo by Tom Hall.That's just the thing I explained above..."
- Necrotizing Fasciitis: A Profound Mystery in Medical Microbiology
- Early Math Classes Biased Against Girls, Affecting Career Choices, Study Finds
- Sucralose Study Ripe for Scare-Mongering
- Is Modern Feminism Incompatible with Science?
- When All Else Fails, Bribing Kids to Eat Better
- Kathleen Gyllenhaal: 'IN UTERO' in Hollywood Q&A