Banner
    Global Warming In 12,000 B.C.
    By News Staff | April 6th 2012 05:00 PM | 6 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    A dramatic sea-level rise occurred at the onset of the first warm period of the last deglaciation, known as the Bølling warming, approximately 14,600 years ago. This event, referred to as Melt-Water Pulse 1A (MWP-1A), corresponds to a rapid collapse of massive ice sheets 14,600 years ago and resulted in global sea-level rise of ~14 m. 

    The Tahiti Sea-Level Expedition 310 of the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) was carried out in 2005 by the European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling (ECORD) and the ECORD Science Operator (ESO) on behalf of IODP. 

    Using uranium-thorium(U-th) dating of coral samples obtained from cores drilled in the Tahiti coral reefs, the researchers were able to reconstruct sea-level rise over the last deglaciation because coral is extremely sensitive to sea-level changes and fossilized corals are therefore an excellent indicator for sea-level changes over time. 

    They found that most of the melting water that contributed to MWP-1A was sourced from the Antarctic ice sheet, highlighting dynamical behaviour of this ice sheet in the past. The authors note that further research is needed using cored fossilized corals to better understand the sequence of events related to ice sheet collapse during the last deglaciation. Today, half of world's population, approximately 3.2 billion people, lives within 200 km of coastline, and a tenth of the population lives less than 10 meters above sea level. 


    Don't let the Yankees cap detract from the quality of the study.

    "Corals are outstanding archives to reconstruct past sea-level changes as they can be dated to within plus or minus 30 years stretching back thousands of years. Moreover, Tahitian reefs are ideally located to reconstruct the deglacial sea-level rise and to constrain short-term events that are thought to have punctuated the period between the Last Glacial Maximum and the present days. Tahiti is located at a sufficiently considerable distance from the major former ice sheets to give us close to the average of sea levels across the globe, as a non-volcanic island it is also subsiding into the ocean at a steady pace that we can easily adjust for."  said Pierre Deschamps of
    CEREGE (UMR Aix-Marseille Univ. - CNRS - IRD - College de France), first author of the study.  "Insights into past sea-level changes may help to better constrain future changes. Our work sheds light onto an extreme event of rise in global sea levels in which ice-sheet collapse coincided with a rapid warming. Whether the freshwater pulse was a result of an already warming word or helped to warm the climate is currently unclear. However, our finding will help scientists currently modeling future climate change scenarios to factor in the dynamic behaviour of major ice sheets and finally to provide more reliable predictions of ice sheet responses to a warming climate". 

    The dynamics of sea-level change in response to massive water discharge - and if that will even happen - contains a lot of unknowns.  IODP Expedition 310 helped international scientists shed light on one of the most important climate event of the last deglaciation, the MWP-1A event.


    Citation: Pierre Deschamps, Nicolas Durand, Edouard Bard, Bruno Hamelin, Gilbert Camoin, Alexander Thomas, Gideon Henderson, Jun’ichi Okuno, Yusuke Yokoyama, 'Ice-sheet collapse and sea-level rise at the Bølling warming 14,600 years ago', Nature 483, 559–564 (29 March 2012) doi:10.1038/nature10902

    Comments

    Tony Fleming
    I'm wondering if this, like our current period of climate change is due to a flip or major excursion of the Earth's magnetic field? (Helen Barratt wrote about the Earth's weakening geomagnetic field just a few weeks ago.) I'm currently writing about inundation events due to magnetic flips of the Earth. They arise in relation to small magnetotactic bacteriae who crawl north-south or south-north depending on the Earth's magnetic polarity. Hence they are seen in deep sea sediments to switch their direction of movement every 10,000 -100,000 years or so.

    Here's what I'm writing:

    "It is relevant in this age of global warming that melting of the polar caps is known to be capable of causing a rise in the oceanic water level to an extent where coastal regions are threatened by inundation. Antarctica accounting for about 90 percent of the world's ice could cause a global rise of ca 60 metres. Global inundation, increased humidity, and rainfall at a time of global warming are possible depending on circumstances. Science does not know how many ice ages there have been but computer aided analysis of sedimentary deep-sea core samples by Lisiecki and Raymo (2005) show steep 'resonances' near temperature peaks and troughs amid very noisy data over the recent few million years. Related to such 'resonances', brief inundations could be caused by glacial thawing due to any sudden rise in temperature."

    Knowledge of a 14 metre high inundations in our most recent past is very interesting.  

    cheers Tony

    Tony Fleming Biophotonics Research Institute tfleming@unifiedphysics.com
    Hank
    I'm wondering if this, like our current period of climate change is due to a flip or major excursion of the Earth's magnetic field? 
    Wouldn't there need to be some evidence for that? You seriously have a PhD in physics and you think that has happened?
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind
    Tony Fleming
    Wouldn't there need to be some evidence for that? You seriously have a PhD in physics and you think that has happened?
    "A dramatic sea-level rise occurred at the onset of the first warm period of the last deglaciation, known as the Bølling warming, approximately 14,600 years ago. This event, referred to as Melt-Water Pulse 1A (MWP-1A), corresponds to a rapid collapse of massive ice sheets 14,600 years ago and resulted in global sea-level rise of ~14 m"

    I'd call this evidence of an inundation 14,600 years ago for a start. Second if you take self-field theory as theoretical evidence then the photon has a self-structure, self-energy and mass. At high energies (core of the earth, sun and maybe other planets) this structure and its quantum state may be modified.  So, it's possibly a form of evidence for the mass and structure of the photon.  As you should know there's a growing amount of literature on this subject

    Leaving that aside, I agree with you that there should be evidence for a flip 14,600 years ago IF there was a complete flip, but it could have been a major excursion and not a complete flip. It is plausible in my opinion.  Calculations show a complete flip would give rise to a 60 metre inundation; then it stands to reason that 14 metres represents a partial inundation, perhaps related to an excursion and not a complete flip, just like we're seeing now. So no PhDs needed for this hypothetical calculation Hank just simple arithmetic.

    But who knows? I could be way wrong. I would like to think there's a doable calculation to tie in self-field theory and the field levels and energy needed for a flip; that's one way to estimate the accuracy of my suggestion.

    What really interests me is the way magnetic flips are a totally chaotic mechanism (in terms of the theory behind the states of the photon-these states are similar to hydrogen atom except continuous rather than discrete) and this is supported by the evidence e.g. Lisiecki and Raymo (2005) This climate change data is so noisy it appears like 'classic' chaos-type data.  So this data 'looks' just like I would imagine how magnetic flips would appear. There's nothing else I can think of that could match such noisy data.

    cheers Tony




    Tony Fleming Biophotonics Research Institute tfleming@unifiedphysics.com
    The Stand-Up Physicist
    Second if you take self-field theory as theoretical evidence then the photon has a self-structure, self-energy and mass.
    I don't have a Ph.D. in physics, but I was under the impression that we have a stupidly large amount of data that says we know exactly what the mass of the photon is: exactly zero.  I think I recall a story Feynman told about putting experimental limits on the mass.  I only have a dim recollection, but I think the person challenged Feynman, so he came up with one set of numbers.  The person came back, demanding a better constraint on the mass being zero.  Feynman figured out a second type of experiment to push the limit.  The guy came back a third time, and Feynman came up with a third idea.  If anyone recalls a story like this and can provide a reference, that would rock.
    Tony Fleming
    Hi Doug 
    Nice to talk to you.  I have a lot of respect for you mathematically and electromagnetically going back some years; especially your quaternions. I think they are intimately linked to my physical spinors. 

    Can't remember that particular story about Richard Feynman but I am currently reading a story about his work on the Bomb during WWII including stories of how he was the bane of the security 'police' by 'breaking into' the security system from time to time thus exposing the absurdly shoddy security system guarding the secrets of the bomb!! He was such a likable rogue he was not sacked but given the job as head of computations (a time before computers).

    I am aware of the large volume of work that says the photon has zero mass. I see this as an approximation in the same way self-field theory (SFT) finds there's a missing ordinate in classical EM. (See the hydrogen atom blog I authored recently on science20.com.) I calculated a non-zero mass that I presented in Moscow 2009. You can download the paper from the proceedings at the following link http://www.piers.org/piersproceedings/piers2k9MoscowProc.php?searchname=...

    There's actually a lot of work also on the possibility of non-zero mass photon apart from SFT. Proca's well known equation he formulated in the 1920's sometimes called the Maxwell-Proca equations incorporating photon mass is one where a magnetic vector potential arises. J.D. Jackson is another theoretician that come to mind.  (Jackson, J. D., Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd Edition, John Wiley&Sons, New York, NY, 1999). Jackson investigated the accuracy of Coulomb's Law and concluded photon mass can be assumed to be zero throughout the classical range of distances and deep into the quantum domain as well. 

    There's also a lot of experimental work that has been conducted including Rod Lakes, University of Wisconsin. (_http://www.aip.org/pnu/1998/split/pnu361-3.htm) including a list of experimental limits on the upper limit to the photon mass (Caso, C., et al., (Particle Data Group), European Physical Journal, Vol. C3, 1, 1998.). All this experimental work uses Proca's equation and has included fly-bys of Jupiter to measure the magnetic vector potential. 

    Interestingly SFT's value for the mass (0.221 x _ eV) is compatible with the current experimental upper limit.

    cheers Tony
    Tony Fleming Biophotonics Research Institute tfleming@unifiedphysics.com
    Tony Fleming
    I've recently shown what the self-field energy of the photon is (link to a science20.com blog). This gives a physical picture of the extrinsic and intrinsic motions of the photon. Like an atom where the magnetic spin is quantized and can have negative and positive values \mathbf{\mu_z} = \pm \frac{1}{2}g{\mu_B}
    the photon can also 'flip' between negative and positive values. Unlike the atom where the change is in quantile steps because only certain fixed energies are possible (because the mass of the electron and proton are different by a factor of about 1837), within the photon every energy is possible (because the sub-photonic particles have equal mass). Hence the 'flip' can happen over a very small change in energy. This appears to be very sudden (similar to metaphase) although a prelude will occur on macroscopic levels as might be occurring now. 

    This is how I see a magnetic flip of the Earth's magnetic field might occur. 

    By estimating the energy involved in a flip of the Earth we may find this is compatible with self-field theory. Of course there's also the flips of the Sun that occur very regularly (11 years odd). Note that this implies the flips of the Earth and the Sun are unrelated which is what we would expect of this hypothetical mechanism. 
     
    Tony Fleming Biophotonics Research Institute tfleming@unifiedphysics.com