Banner
    Habitable Zone - G5 Star Planet Kepler 22b Is A Warm Super-Earth
    By News Staff | December 5th 2011 02:52 PM | 10 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    Queue the 'life on other planets' media buzz.  NASA's Kepler Mission has discovered the first super-Earth orbiting in the habitable zone of a star similar to our Sun.

    The host star lies about 600 light-years away from us toward the constellations of Lyra and Cygnus. The star, a G5 star, has a mass and a radius only slightly smaller than that of our Sun, a G2 star. As a result, it is about 25% less luminous than the Sun. The planet orbits the G5 star with an orbital period of 290 days, compared to 365 days for the Earth, at a distance about 15% closer to its star than the Earth from the Sun. This results in the planet's balmy temperature of around 72 degrees Fahrenheit.  It orbits in the middle of the star's habitable zone, where liquid water is expected to be able to exist on the surface of the planet. Liquid water is necessary for life as we know it so speculation will be rampant that this new planet might well be not only habitable, perhaps even inhabited - especially during funding talks.

    The discovery team, led by William Borucki of the NASA Ames Research Center, used photometric data from the NASA Kepler space telescope, which monitors the brightness of 155,000 stars. Earth-size planets whose orbital planes are aligned such that they periodically pass in front of their stars result in tiny dimming of their host star's light; dimming that can only be measured by a specialized space telescope like Kepler.

    Numerous large, massive gas giant planets have been detected previously in habitable-zone orbits around solar-type stars, but gas giants are not thought to be capable of supporting life. This new exoplanet is the smallest-radius planet discovered in the habitable zone of any star to date. It is about 2.4 times larger than that of the Earth, putting it in the class of exoplanets known as super-Earths. 

    While the mass of this new planet is not known, it must be less than about 36 times that of the Earth, based on the absence of a measurable Doppler (radial velocity) wobble in the host star. The masses of several other super-Earths have been measured with the Doppler technique and determined to lie in the range of about 5 to 10 times that of the Earth: Some appear to be rocky, while others probably contain major fractions of ice and water.  

    The finding will be published in the Astrophysical Journal.

    Comments

    Please consult a dictionary. "Queue" does not mean "cue."

    Hank
    No one said it did.  Queue does have a precise meaning, and the organized line of hysterical claims in the mainstream press queued up right on cue.
    Hello Earth. Time to make the government give up the info on all of the secrets regarding ET's, and all things extra-terrestrial. Aren't we all grown up enough to 'handle the truth? Evolving is all we have!

    It will be interesting to see how much money is now put into expanding out knowledge of space using the Kepler telescope and other tech in the future.

    Hank
    Kepler has no funding issues; if anything, this is more proof that Big Science boondoggles like the James Webb Space Telescope, which bleeds other astronomy projects with its cost overruns and bad press, are a bad idea.  More Keplers with budget instead squandered on something no one even knows can work would be terrific for science overall.

    Instead, the usual suspects will circle the wagons over throwing more money at JWST and not care what happens to the rest of space science.
    But wouldn't JWST be able to move forward on what Kepler discovers, been able to image these planets?

    Hank
    No, it isn't designed the same way. Kepler uses the transient method to find other planets and JWST is for distant observations rather than atmospheric studies that could tell us anything about this one they found - there is no super telescope that does everything so they build a lot of missions that do different things, though sometimes they can corroborate each other.

    The problem with JWST was it was funded with only a 50% confidence it could work at all - they funded it without knowing how to build it to do what they said it should do and still don't know if it will work or when it can be finished - it was supposed to be done already and is always 4 years and another few billion away.  And now its cost overruns mean projects that can be engineered and will work won't get funded.
    Thor Russell
    Do you know when/what it will take to be able to measure the atmospheres of planets such as these? That could really tell us a lot. Would we need a much bigger/more expensive telescope.
    Thor Russell
    How does the higher gravity impact what kind of atmosphere a super-Earth has and, through the greenhouse effect, the surface temperature? The mass should affect whether a planet is in the habitable zone or not, but by how much?

    Less than about 36 times that of the Earth must mean one would weigh less than about 36 times on the surface. Am I correct?

    Add a comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite><TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe><u><font>
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    CAPTCHA
    If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.