Neutron Collapses Killed The Radio Star
    By News Staff | December 20th 2013 10:36 AM | 4 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments

    A new population of exploding stars must 'switch off' their radio transmissions before collapsing into a Black Hole. But they emit one last strong beam of highly energetic radiation, known as a gamma-ray burst, before they die.

    It was thought all gamma-ray bursts were followed by a radio afterglow.

    "But we were wrong. After studying an ultra-sensitive image of gamma-ray bursts with no afterglow, we can now say the theory was incorrect and our telescopes have not failed us," Centre for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO) at Curtin University research fellow Dr. Paul Hancock said.

    The technique they used to create the ultra-sensitive image allowed for the stacking of 200 separate observations on top of each other to re-create the image of a gamma-ray burst in much better quality – yet, no trace of a radio afterglow was found.

    "In our research paper we argue that there must be two distinct types of gamma-ray burst, likely linked to differences in the magnetic field of the exploding star," Hancock said. "Gamma-ray bursts are thought to mark the birth of a Black Hole or Neutron Star – both of which have super-dense cores. But Neutron Stars have such strong magnetic fields (a million times stronger than those of Black Holes) that producing gamma-rays are more difficult.

    "We think that those stars that collapse to form a Neutron Star have energy left over to produce the radio afterglow whereas those that become Black Holes put all their energy into one final powerful gamma-ray flash."

    New work is underway to test the team's theory and to see if there are other subtle ways in which the two types of bursts differ.

    "We now have to take a whole new look at gamma-ray bursts – so far this work has shown that being wrong is sometimes more interesting than being right," Hancock said. 

    Telescope facilities such as the Australia Telescope Compact Array in northern New South Wales and the Karl Jansky Very Large Array in the US both have observing programs to search for gamma-ray burst afterglows and have been recently upgraded to increase their sensitivity.

     Preprint: Paul J Hancock, Bryan M Gaensler, Tara Murphy, 'Two populations of gamma-ray burst radio afterglows', arXiv:1308.4766. Published in The Astrophysical Journal. Source: Curtin University


    John Duffield
    Nice research, nice reportage.
    HELLO? Worst science reporting of the week at least! How can something that does not yet exist (black hole) be responsible for the death of the very thing that it transitioned from? That's just ignorant This is a failed attempt to get a musical reference into a badly written headline. The neutron collapse does not "kill" the radio star; to put it that way is to fundamentally misstate the underlying science of the transitional states of stars. Nothing died. No stars were hurt in the making of this black hole - it's still the same thing - it used to be stardust, now it's a black hole or a neutron star, but no murders occurred, no deaths were initiated. Let's try to take science more seriously.

    Black holes don't exist? 

    Anyway, if you don't agree with their finding, at least read their paper first, then yell at Hancock.
    He's just saying that the specific black hole the star transitioned to didn't exist at the time the star "died" - not that black holes don't actually exist.

    He was ranting that the OP (in his opinion) made a logical fallacy in the same vein as saying "All men become corpses when they die; thus, the corpse killed the man."

    Amusing all the way around. ;)