Banner
    SDSS J102915+172927 - The Star That Shouldn't Exist
    By News Staff | August 31st 2011 01:20 PM | 8 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments

    SDSS J102915+172927 is in the constellation of Leo.   It has a mass smaller than that of the Sun and is probably more than 13 billion years old and has been found to have the lowest amount of elements heavier than helium (what astronomers call "metals") of all stars yet studied.

    The mystery?  It shouldn't exist.

    "A widely accepted theory predicts that stars like this, with low mass and extremely low quantities of metals, shouldn't exist because the clouds of material from which they formed could never have condensed," said Elisabetta Caffau (Zentrum fur Astronomie der Universitat Heidelberg, Germany and Observatoire de Paris, France), lead author of a new paper. "It was surprising to find, for the first time, a star in this 'forbidden zone', and it means we may have to revisit some of the star formation models."

    The team analyzed SDSS J102915+172927 using the X-shooter and UVES instruments on the VLT, which allowed them to measure how abundant the various chemical elements were in the star. They found that the proportion of metals in SDSS J102915+172927 is more than 20 000 times smaller than that of the Sun.

    SDSS J102915+172927 composition
    An ancient star in the constellation of Leo (The Lion), called SDSS J102915+172927, has been found to have the lowest amount of elements heavier than helium of all stars yet studied. The pie-chart shows the star’s composition: it is almost entirely made from hydrogen and helium with only a tiny trace of heavier elements. Credit:ESO/Digitized Sky Survey 2

    The star is faint, and so metal-poor that they could only detect the signature of one element heavier than helium — calcium — in their first observations.  Cosmologists believe that the lightest chemical elements — hydrogen and helium — were created shortly after the Big Bang, together with some lithium, while almost all other elements were formed later in stars. Supernova explosions spread the stellar material into the interstellar medium, making it richer in metals. New stars form from this enriched medium so they have higher amounts of metals in their composition than the older stars. Therefore, the proportion of metals in a star tells us how old it is.

    SDSS J102915+172927 spectrum

    The distribution of the light of different colors coming from SDSS J102915+172927 after it has been split up by the X-Shooter instrument on the ESO VLT. Different colors fall in different places in this strange picture and astronomers can use this data to find the chemical signals from different elements within the star, which show up as dark interruptions of the curved lines. The spectrum of the star appears to be triple at each wavelengths as it was split up using an integral field unit to collect as much light as possible. This ancient star has been found to have the lowest amount of elements heavier than helium of all stars yet studied. The only evidence of elements heavier than helium is two dark lines from the element calcium. Credit: ESO/E. Caffau

    "The star we have studied is extremely metal-poor, meaning it is very primitive. It could be one of the oldest stars ever found," adds Lorenzo Monaco (ESO, Chile), also involved in the study.

    Also very surprising was the lack of lithium in SDSS J102915+172927. Such an old star should have a composition similar to that of the Universe shortly after the Big Bang, with a few more metals in it. But the team found that the proportion of lithium in the star was at least fifty times less than expected in the material produced by the Big Bang.


    Wide-field view of the bright constellation of Leo (The Lion) and slowly closes in on what looks like an unremarkable faint star, SDSS J102915+172927, which turns out to have the lowest amount of elements heavier than helium of all stars yet studied. It has a mass smaller than that of the Sun and is probably more than 13 billion years old. Credit: ESO/A. Fujii/Digitized Sky Survey 2. Music: John Dyson (from the album Moonwind)

    "It is a mystery how the lithium that formed just after the beginning of the Universe was destroyed in this star." Bonifacio added.

    The researchers also point out that this freakish star is probably not unique. "We have identified several more candidate stars that might have metal levels similar to, or even lower than, those in SDSS J102915+172927. We are now planning to observe them with the VLT to see if this is the case," concludes Caffau.

    Comments

    (A widely accepted theory) != true

    Hank
    Theoretical people call a lot of things theories, which is unfortunate, but in this case it passed the tests.  It just turned out to have an exception.
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind
    Halliday
    The apparent fact that there are low mass stars that are older than what a "widely accepted theory" predicts isn't much of a problem (I've always felt like the "dark ages" that followed after the last scattering surface of the Big Bang [what we see as the Cosmic Microwave Radiation, today] couldn't be nearly as long as claimed).

    What looks like a much greater potential problem, in my opinion, is the lack of Lithium!  Now, that could cause trouble.

    David
    @Anonymous: But no scientific theory is 'true' in the Boolean sense you imply; more like "true enough" to explain all the evidence gathered so far. It's essential that even the most widely accepted theories yield in the face of contradictory observations, however improbable these were thought to be. That is what is happening here. This essay by Asimov nicely explains how it works.

    Hank
    But even the term theory has become colloquial, including to some in science.  Theoretical physics and the social sciences are the two greatest offenders - in the case of physics, it involves using a hypothesis but then using theory as part of its proper name and in the social sciences, it involves coming up with something crazy and calling it a theory when it is barely a hypothesis.
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind
    I always like to know the distance of astronomical objects; the only mention for this star was "3,500 above the disk of the milky way". Does anyone know the approximate distance to SDSS J102915+172927 from Sol?

    The star SDSS J1020915+1729 confirm my theory that Universe at the beginning was cold - approximately 3K.

    Maybe this star has lost mass during its 13 billion year life. It was eaten away at but not completely devoured.

    Maybe the star formed with its current level of mass because higher pressure in the early universe did not require temperatures for condensation as low as those presently needed in star formation.