Banner
    "Tragedy Of The Commons" - Aggression In Evolution Could Make Species Extinct?
    By News Staff | May 16th 2011 02:43 PM | 2 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    Aggression in mating males is a successful reproductive strategy for individuals but a numerical model says it can drive a species to extinction,

    Evolutionary biologists have long debated whether the behavior of the individual is able to influence processes on a population or species level but the possibility of selection at the species level remains controversial.   Using a mathematical model, an international team of researchers now say that aggressive male sexual behavior not only harms the female, but can also cause entire populations to die out.

    For their study, the scientists concentrated on the extreme sexual conflict of seed beetles.   Male seed beetles have barbed penises (see also Seed Beetles And Rough Sex) which make it impossible for the female to shake off an unwelcome mate. The aggressive males have a higher reproductive rate as they are more successful than less aggressive males; however, they harm the female during the mating process. The researchers have now shown that the greater mating success of aggressive males can result in the males of a species becoming more aggressive in general. 

    The aggression spiral has dramatic consequences for the population and species: More females are harmed during mating and die from their injuries. This means the females become scarcer as a resource for the males and the species eventually dies out. Individual interests and the interests of the population contrast greatly in the present case.

    In economics they call those clashes of individual and group interests the "tragedy of the commons". The principle refers to the overexploitation of collective resources and serves, among other things, to describe human dilemmas related to environmental pollution and taxation. In nature, the tragedy of the commons is limited as aggressive behavior is costly for the individual. This also explains why such severe sexual conflicts as in the case of the seed beetle cannot be observed everywhere. Species with too high an injury rate during reproduction have driven themselves to extinction in the course of evolution. In the case studied, the female's tactical response is to steer clear of aggressive males. 
     

    "In nature, there are many examples of tragedies of the commons," says
    evolutionary biologist  Daniel Rankin from the University of Zurich - understanding how nature solves the tragedy of the commons could also inspire solutions to human problems.

    The paper was published in the journal The American Naturalist  and funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF). 

    Comments

    Steve Davis
    The so-called "tragedy of the commons" has been greatly overstated, and was actually withdrawn by the coiner of the phrase, but there's no point in ditching excellent propaganda, is there? There's no reference to the "tragedy of the private sector" is there? "In nature, there are many examples of tragedies of the commons," says evolutionary biologist Daniel Rankin. There's also many examples of common control resulting in sustainable resource management.
    Gerhard Adam
    Unfortunately this is NOT a "tragedy of the commons".  A tragedy of the commons specifically deals with a chronic inability to sustain a resource that all are free to use, or free to abuse.

    To put females into this category defies any logic or reasoning that I can imagine.  Females are NOT a common resources that can be used or abused.  This is not based on some political reasoning, but on the rather obvious case that they ALSO participate in selection and will change/adapt to circumstances.  To behave as if only the males are subject to selection is simply ignorant.
    Species with too high an injury rate during reproduction have driven themselves to extinction in the course of evolution.
    OK ... name one, otherwise this is simply an anecdotal assertion.
    The aggressive males have a higher reproductive rate as they are more successful than less aggressive males; however, they harm the female during the mating process. The researchers have now shown that the greater mating success of aggressive males can result in the males of a species becoming more aggressive in general.
    If aggressive males have higher fitness, then it argues against the idea that it is driving them to extinction.  However, this could also result in females avoiding the more aggressive males in favor of less aggressive ones and eventually drive the more aggressive trait into "extinction".  This is more like a predator/prey situation where a predator that over-hunts will be reduced back until the prey recovers.  Could it lead to extinction?  Possibly, but that doesn't seem like it's a realistic possibility at this juncture.