Over the past 50 years, humans have changed the world’s ecosystems more rapidly and extensively than in any other comparable period in human history.
What researchers in a new Ambio paper are calling 'The Great Acceleration', stage 2 of the Anthropocene epoch, leads to questions how humankind will react in stage 3 - defined as the recognition that human activities are indeed affecting the structure and functioning of the Earth System as a whole.
Increased research and understanding, the Internet, and more free and open societies have influenced humanity to become a self-conscious, active agent in the operation of its own life support system. The new study discusses the three known broad philosophical approaches that address the Earth System; the business-as-usual approach, mitigation, and geo-engineering options.
The business-as-usual approach is based on three assumptions. First, global change will not be severe or rapid enough to cause major disruptions. Second, the existing market-oriented economic system can deal autonomously with any required adaptations. And third, resources required to mitigate global change proactively would be better spent on more pressing human needs.
By the time humans realize that a business-as-usual approach may not work, the world will be committed to further decades of environmental change.
The second approach, mitigation, is an alternative pathway based on the notion that the threat of further global change is serious enough that it must be dealt with immediately and by curbing greenhouse gases. Technology will play a strong role in reducing the pressure on the Earth System. The critical question is whether the trends of dematerialization and shifting societal values become strong enough to trigger a transition of a globalized society toward a much more sustainable one.
The third approach, geo-engineering, involves purposeful manipulation by humans of global-scale processes with the intention of counteracting human-driven environmental change. Geo-engineering solutions raise serious ethical questions and intense debate, such as when unintended and unanticipated side effects of the solutions have severe consequences.
According to the report, The Great Acceleration is reaching criticality. Enormous challenges confront humanity in the next few decades as we pass through the bottleneck of continued population growth, excessive resource use, and environmental deterioration. In most parts of the world, the demand for fossil fuels overwhelms the desire to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Whatever unfolds, the next few decades will surely be a tipping point in the evolution of the Anthropocene.
Article: The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature?, Will Steffen, Paul J. Crutzen and John R. McNeill, Ambio, Volume 36, Issue 8 (December 2007)
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Reduce Prostate Cancer Risk By Sleeping With Lots Of Women - But Not Men
- Greenpeace Says Its GMOs Are Better Than Science's GMOs, Still Hates Golden Rice
- Homo Floresiensis: Hobbit Species Continues To Provoke Questions About Human Evolution
- Supersonic Laser-Propelled Aircraft Get A Step Closer
- Okay With Disgusting Images? You Vote This Way 95 Percent Of The Time
- Everyone Hates Daylight Savings Time - But It Might Improve Public Health
- This Mid-Term Election Can Have Evolutionary Consequences
- "Of course they aren't. These are scientific terms Hank Campbell and you can't just interpret them..."
- "The wealthiest are only formally most educated and, from both my personal expriences and reading..."
- "You think the marker assisted selection suddenly being endorsed by Greenpeace is not genetic modification..."
- "food and energy are not major issues Are you for real???! As for the rest - well, population control..."
- "There are no Greenpeace GMOs. Go away with your bullcrap and take your GMOs with you. ..."
- Genetically modified clean energy from bacteria
- Designer babies: You can screen for cystic fibrosis but intelligence is a way off
- Science as profane: What superstition of 1752 and 2014 share in common
- What’s so “natural” about “natural crop breeding”?
- Worried you have cancer? Take a Google pill!
- Mars bars for brain health? Not so fast