Banner
    Can Squid Fishing Be Less Deadly (For Non-Squid)?
    By Danna Staaf | January 30th 2012 07:28 PM | 9 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    About Danna

    Cephalopods have been rocking my world since I was in grade school. I pursued them through a BA in marine biology at the University of California...

    View Danna's Profile
    Most of the time, fishermen fish for one particular creature--be it tuna, sardines, or shrimp. Unfortunately, species tend to exist in a commingled muddle called ecology, and it's often difficult to separate them with fishing gear.

    On the east coast of the US, longfin squid are caught with trawl nets. When dragged through the water, trawl nets also collects things which are not squid, called bycatch. And although the population of longfin squid seems to be reasonably healthy, some of these bycatch species are not doing so well.

    River herring is one of these unfortunates. Back in October, New Jersey was trying to figure out how to let fishermen keep catching squid without killing river herring, but the state had no money for implementing any proposed solution.

    Now, with the river herring situation growing more dire and a continued lack of funds for studying it, they've been forced to ban the catch and sale of river herring in New Jersey.

    The ban only affects state waters, so squid fishermen who trawl in federal waters won't be in trouble if their nets keep bringing up river herring. But these fish can't be brought back to New Jersey and sold. (Although bycatch species aren't caught intentionally, fishermen are usually happy to sell them, rather than throwing them back into the water. I'm pretty sure that the river herring are already dead by the time they're brought up and sorted out from the squid, so it doesn't matter to them.)

    Anyway, the upshot is that the new ban doesn't help the bycatch problem. Other things might. 

    Someday, river herring could benefit from studies on butterfish, another longfin squid bycatch species.  Researchers have produced models that predict, in real time and on a fine geographic scale, exactly where butterfish are. They hope that these models can help squid fishermen avoid butterfish while still catching squid.

    I wonder if the river herring folk are already talking to the butterfish folk?

    (Of course, it's all one to the squid.)

    Comments

    New Zealand squid trawlers were bringing in endangered sea lions which were drowned and mauled (somehow). The trawlers said it was coincidence because there's nothing in the net that could mess them up like that, so they were already dead before they were caught. They didn't mention though that trawlers work in parallel groups like wheat harvesters, following behind and to the side. A Sea lion would dart under the first net to pick up shrimp and flounders scared up by the net, and the net (weighing tons) comes down on top of them. A second trawler sometimes scoops up the carcass. I don't know how or if it was resolved.

    Danna Staaf
    Yeah, the NZ seal issue has been popping up on my "squid" news alert a lot lately! I blogged about how moving from trawl nets to jigging would solve the bycatch problem in most cases, but I don't know how seriously they're considering that. And, of course, it's wouldn't solve the competition-for-resources problem.
    I think they could solve it by staying off the bottom. Drag nets already have control planes, it would just take some different sensors to tell where the bottom is, an automatic feedback loop would help too. Right now it's left to the discretion of the operator to say where the bottom is.

    There are connections between the butterfish folks and the river herring folks and some researchers are already looking at real-time river herring avoidance measures (http://www.smast.umassd.edu/Bycatch_Avoidance/index.php) and those same researchers are considering how the butterfish models could be adapted for river herring. The butterfish models are currently being tested to see if/how well they work

    Also, while preliminary indications suggest that river herring bycatch in the longfin squid squid fishery A) is smaller than the longfin squid fishery's butterfish bycatch and B) is smaller than the river herring catch in other fisheries, the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC) is looking at river herring monitoring and bycatch minimization in both its mackerel and longfin squid fisheries. Similarly, the New England Fishery Management Council is looking at river herring bycatch in the directed Atlantic (sea) herring fishery. To track these actions, see http://www.mafmc.org/fmp/msb_files/msbAm14current.htm and http://www.nefmc.org/herring/index.html. Folks can also contact me for more info if they have any questions.

    Jason Didden
    MAFMC Plan Coordinator for Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish
    jdidden@mafmc.org

    Danna Staaf
    Fantastic! Thank you so much for finding this post&taking the time to comment. Oh man, I love the internet. That's exactly what I was hoping to learn.

    The articles I read were all bemoaning how NJ doesn't have any money to deal with this problem, so it's great news that there's a larger body working on it.
    It’s a shame that the author here didn’t check all the facts – NJ is still allowing those federal boats a 5% “bycatch” allowance, to allow those commercial boats to land the river herring that is caught along with squid, mackerel, ect. Because NJ has no money to enforce that allowance, the problem of federal catch of river herring is going to persist until the MAFMC manages river herring, and puts a cap on the total amount that can be taken from ocean waters. Until that happens, NJ rec. anglers (and inshore comm. Fishermen) will suffer because of this unrestricted catch at sea.

    Danna Staaf
    Thanks for commenting. I hadn't heard about the 5% allowance--does it apply to boats fishing in NJ waters, or federal waters, or both? The only information I could find about it online was the first comment on this article, which doesn't really answer that question. 
    When I wrote this post, I thought there were no restrictions on river herring bycatch in federal waters, and I'm still not sure that isn't the case. Obviously, whether there are no restrictions or an unenforced restriction, it's a serious problem! I think we're on the same page here. =)
    You are right, there are zero restrictions on the catch of river herring in federal waters.

    As for the 5% allowance, this is the announcement from NJ:
    http://www.njfishandwildlife.com/news/2012/herring-tog_regchange.htm

    Danna Staaf
    Thanks!

    Add a comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite><TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe><u><font>
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    CAPTCHA
    If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.