Banner
Highway 61 revisited

As I sit here with a Cesária Évora CD on in the house, I have an update to the car AV system...

Patterns In Randomness: The Bob Dylan Edition

The human brain is very good — quite excellent, really — at finding patterns. We delight in...

Web Page Mistakes And The 'Lazy Thumbnail'

I don’t understand, sometimes, how people put together their web pages. Who really thinks that...

Anti-theft?

The navigation system in my car has an anti-theft feature that’s interesting, in that it...

User picture.
picture for Michael Whitepicture for Gerhard Adam
Barry LeibaRSS Feed of this column.

I’m a computer software researcher, and I'm currently working independently on Internet Messaging Technology. I retired at the end of February... Read More »

Blogroll

A story about impending U.S. legislation has hit the news in the last few days: Senator Patrick Leahy, along with ten co-sponsors that include Dianne Feinstein and my own senator, Chuck Schumer), has introduced S. 3804, the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (link to PDF).

There’s a log of blog outcry about it, of course, and rightly so. I’m less worried about it than many, but I do think it’s a bad idea. Here’s why:

I have a few notes on home networks, which notes come from recent experience with some network setup issues.

Encryption: How to secure one’s network — or whether not to — continues to be a point of debate. I favour some of the arguments for being a “good citizen” and leaving your network open, and then making sure your computers are secure. Still, that works best if you don’t want to communicate between computers within your network, and can just wall each one off.

It’s managed to stay out of the general press, mostly — probably because it’s geeky, it’s hard to explain what it really means, and it’s not likely to affect anything any time soon — but the tech press has been covering the cracking of the HDCP master key. But even PC Mag got it wrong at first, having to correct their article.

To see what it does mean, it helps to back up a bit. If you have a TV made in the last few years, look at the back, where all the associated components can plug in. Especially if your TV is high-definition, you’ll have quite a mass of sockets back there.

Originally, televisions just got their signals “off the air”, using antennas.

Last week, I talked about Amazon’s email-in service, which lets you send documents to your Kindle by email. The nicest part of it for me is the PDF conversion feature, but you can, in general, sent any personal documents you like, with or without conversion to AZW.

The way it works is this:

Yesterday, I complained about the new Kindle’s handling of PDF files, which, despite my complaints, is better than what the earlier software does.

I decided to try out one of the new Kindle e-readers. Only, I’m not planning to use it for the purpose that most buyers do — purchasing and reading books. I want to use it to read academic papers, articles, and IETF documents, which I will put on the device myself. These will generally be either plain text files or PDFs, and I decided to try the Kindle because it will read those types of files.

First, I’ll note that the new device is all it’s advertised to be: it’s small, it’s light, it’s crisp and easy to read, and it’s sleek and comfortable. I imagine it’s a really great device to read books on, when you don’t want to schlep a bunch of books around.