Fake Banner
    Obama And Clinton Saved The KEDs
    By Ed Chen | March 24th 2011 03:02 PM | 6 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    About Ed

    Ed is an NGO representative to the United Nations for the Lawyer's Committee on Nuclear Policy. He is a Columbia College graduate (Cum Laude; Departmental...

    View Ed's Profile

    Watch the videos in this YouTube channel carefully: http://www.youtube.com/user/SaveLibya?feature=chclk and you will realize that the people being mowed down in the street are by and large kids, 35 and younger.  Young people, students wearing hipster clothes.  They are dressed like us.  Wearing the same shoes as us. 


    Remember the days when you were young, probably growing up in suburbia, or the city, trying not to get caught smoking cigarettes, or paying that homeless man to buy you a bottle of liquor.  Hoping the cops didn't catch you in the act and throw you in jail.  Imaging having to watch your back not only to drink and smoke, but also for saying something, anything that might be interpreted as unpatriotic, as not supporting the government, by anyone -- even people who hate you.  And instead of getting pulled over and forced to hire an expensive lawyer and pay a hefty fine. You'd have snipers posted to your building, with instructions to kill you next time they see you.


    And if you got mad and got together with a bunch of friends and threw a party when your parents weren't home, they might roll out the tanks on you and demolish your house. 


    For those who are uncertain about whether we should be doing what we're doing in Libya, watch those videos carefully.  We are not helping a bunch of gangsters who wear headscarves and cover their faces while brandishing AK-47s.  We're helping Kids hopping around in Keds, praying to God that America bombs the shit out of those tank formations, and destroys the airplanes shooting at them.   All of them are not certain what to do, and nearly forlorn when they were shooting at gunships in the air with rusty old bullets, and getting bombed and blown to pieces by artillery.


    Obama and Clinton Saved the Kids.  That's why they didn't inform congress.  They didn't have time to wait for them to get back from their Spring recess. 


    Please write your congressman and tell them to support the president, who has just performed his first truly Brilliant Act.

    http://www.house.gov/house/House_Calendar.shtml

    Comments

    Hank
    When the dictator in Kosovo was only killing his own people and no threat to anyone outside his own borders, military intervention was good.   When the dictator in Iraq was only killing his own people and no threat to anyone outside his own borders, military intervention was bad.   Now the dictator in Libya is only killing his own people and no threat to anyone outside his own borders, and military intervention is good again.      

    Why are Iraqi children not worth saving but those other two instances were?  The answer is better public relations by journalists for anyone not named Bush.
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind
    Gerhard Adam
    I'll go a step further and ask about what happened in Darfur?  What about all the other places on the planet where people are being killed by their governments?

    Ed Chen
    The key difference is Revolution.  When a people are in revolution, that is the time to step in.  Anytime before or after, and military intervention is worthless. 

    Darfur, we took too long.   We should have intervened in Iraq for the shiites and avoided a 20 year war and inciting both Sunnis and Shiites against us. 

    Revolutionary Fervor lasts for onl a few weeks.  weW are fortunate to have an administration which learned it lesson from Serbia, Iraq, and Afghanistan.  All 3 cases we waited to long.  3.5 years in Serbia, 12 years in Iraq, and over 20 years in Afghanistan.

    Big cancers are much harder to kill than small ones. 

    Gerhard Adam
    You're cherry-picking here and advocating a form of imperialism.  Who determines which side in a revolution is worth supporting?  The Taliban is technical revolting against the U.S. backed government in Kabul ... who decides?  What differentiates a "freedom fighter" from an insurgent?

    Is it strictly our political interests that determine this?  If so, then we can eliminate any interpretation that makes us the "good guys". 
    Hank
    I have to agree, Ed.   It seems a little convenient to say that the Libyan rebels are rebelling but the Kurds in Iraq who were gassed mercilessly because they were rebelling were somehow not worthy of western involvement.   Hussein killed 1000X as many people as Qaddafi has.   Now, if you supported military intervention in Iraq also, cool, you are a guy who believes in putting things at stake to spread freedom and I am okay with that.

    But, again, the entire League of Arab States is no different than Libya - zero human rights and 100% run by mass-murdering dictators.   So where will you stop?
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind
    Ed Chen
    All valid points.  Intervention is a slippery slope.

    i'd address that in the other article obama's new precendent. 

    But basically, no use of heavy weapons, aerial bombardment, naval bombardment, snipers, and mercenaries against peaceful domestic protesters.