Banner
    Has Al Gore faked a global warming experiment?
    By Robert H Olley | September 28th 2011 01:17 PM | 11 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    About Robert H

    Until recently, I worked in the Polymer Physics Group of the Physics Department at the University of Reading.

    I would describe myself

    ...

    View Robert H's Profile
    My attention has been drawn to this, by Anthony Watts:

    Video analysis and scene replication suggests that Al Gore’s Climate Reality Project fabricated their Climate 101 video “Simple Experiment”


    I would like to scrutinize it myself, but
    Nad oes ynof nerth na bywyd
    Fel yn gorwedd yn y bedd

    I have no strength or life
    Like one lying in a grave
    so I would be pleased if any readers could give their verdict.

    Comments

    MikeCrow
    I've seen other tests of co2 in a bottle that did not show a measurable increase (in fact I don't think it went up as much), I tried to find that link, but couldn't. This isn't the one, but it's close. Also note, if you look at the spectrum for CO2 below, using a IR lamp will give totally different results than using something between -50 to 100F.

    I would like to see the results if someone posts them. I also wish someone would run the test with specific amounts of co2 and water in a box bigger than a breadbox.

    With all of the Physicists here, maybe someone can help me with this.

    With 70% of the earth covered in water, and this being the fftir spectrum for condensed water


    First wouldn't the radiated ir have this spectrum, and not the default blackbody spectrum?

    Second, with this being CO2


    How would you calculate the coupling coefficient in the 13-17um wavelengths.
    Never is a long time.
    Bonny Bonobo alias Brat
    I have no strength or life
    Like one lying in a grave
    Gosh, I hope you feel better soon Robert.


    Make love not war
    rholley
    Thank you, Helen.

    Perhaps I am exaggerating a bit (the quote is from Cwm Rhondda) but I do not have the energy to write a full article, which is why I’m doing these short blogs.
    Robert H. Olley Quondam Physics Department University of Reading England
    Bonny Bonobo alias Brat
    Robert, I do hope you have seen a doctor about why your energy is depleted, unlike the 58% of men who don't see a doctor when they should? According to this au.askmen.com website which gives the top five reasons why men don't visit doctors when they should :- 
    A recent poll of 1,100 men showed that even under the best circumstances -- when men have health insurance and have a primary doctor they feel comfortable talking to -- 58% say that something still keeps them from actually going to the doctor. 
    Of their top 5 reasons why these men don't visit a doctor one reason is because there is no significant female nagging them to go and another reason is because there is a female who is nagging them too much to go! (Sorry about the pictures of women with breast implants on the right hand side of this website, I don't suppose we need to ask men why they are there).
    Make love not war
    rholley
    Thank you for your concern, Helen.

    I’ve been receiving treatment (not too gruesome, just a course of tablets) for some time now, in order to control the underlying condition.
    Robert H. Olley Quondam Physics Department University of Reading England
    Bonny Bonobo alias Brat
    Good, no need to increase or decrease the current levels of female nagging in your life then? If the pills are for blood pressure or cholesterol then don't forget there are also many more natural things that you can do to counteract these symptoms and their conventional drug side-effects, like biofeedback, relaxation techniques, regular exercise and healthy diet for example. Whoops, am I nagging again? I hope you get well soon Robert.
    Make love not war
    Hank
    This is the great thing about the Internet and why blogging does more fact-checking than journalism.  There may be nothing to this, though it seems odd to splice together different takes for something as simple as putting a tube in a jar - but the standard for validity goes way up when you have skeptics rather than acolytes looking at the work.

    Why I doubt it is faked?  Al Gore and company have seen it all by now so they knew putting this out there for the world would get scrutiny and wouldn't have done that if there was a real issue.
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind
    UvaE
    Hope you feel better, Robert.

    The emphasis probably should be placed on trying to replicate the experiment rather than wondering about the edits.
    logicman
    Robert: I hope you feel better soon.

    In reply to your question: Al Gore has not faked an experiment - Anthony Watts himself has said so.

    The good thing about that WUWT article is that it is so long that only the most devoted fans will read it.
    The bad thing is that ... ditto.  Which means that the well-buried assertion that the experiment is a valid one and has been replicated will likely escape the notice of most people.

    I have cited this in my most recent article.

    ... while some might say the stagecraft involved in the Climate 101 presentation wasn’t dishonest it was most assuredly staged with great literary license and dramatization of an effect that was experimentally verified elsewhere ...
    Anthony Watts
    rholley
    Well analysed, Patrick.  I myself didn’t see the bit where Watts grudgingly asserts the validity of the experiment.

    Unfortunately James Delingpole read it, and publicized it on the Telegraph, but completely missed the bit at the end.  My guess is that he simply didn’t see what he didn’t want to see. 

    Al Gore probably means well, but the perception that he’s doing well out of the issue may well render any input of his counter-productive.  Here is my take on the political side of things:
    2040, and Texas has become a desert.  A visitor approaches a huge bonfire with an effigy on top.

    “Excuse me, what is this all about?”

    “This is the Bush-burning Ceremony.  Bush Junior refused to take global warming seriously, and now our state’s a desert and our agriculture’s ruined.”

    “But that effigy doesn’t look much like him.”

    “It isn’t meant to.  The Bush is all the shrubbery we’re using for the bonfire.”

    “Then who’s the effigy of?”

    “It’s Al Gore.  He made things worse by making it impossible for people to take global warming seriously.”
    Robert H. Olley Quondam Physics Department University of Reading England
    logicman
    Please!  No Delingpoles, sir!  That guy never had an original thought in his whole life.  He writes books about a WW2 soldier called Coward.  How original!  A soldier called Coward who belies his name.  Who woulda thunk it?