On Christmas Eve, the Russian research vessel Akademik Shokalskiy, on an Antarctic expedition to duplicate a voyage 100 years ago, the 1911-to-1913 voyage of Australian explorer Douglas Mawson to Antarctica, and study the effects of global warming, became stuck in ice and its 52 passengers were trapped for 8 days before a helicopter from the Chinese ship Xue Long rescued them.
Then the Xue Long got stuck in the ice.
Like climate activists and journalists who insist they need to fly to every climate meeting to build relationships while they tell us to reduce our carbon footprint, it has to be asked how much carbon was created undertaking the trip and the resulting rescue. Answer: A lot.
They had claimed they only needed to plant 800 trees to cover their carbon footprint. If you believe that, well, you aren't doing the math. That uses the assumption that the ship was going there anyway, the other people were going there, and thus they only needed to cover their part. But even using that suspect metric the carbon footprint cost will now be almost 700 percent higher, some 5,000 trees.
The director of the French Polar Institute, Yves Frenot, called this a "pseudo-scientific expedition" - no surprise when it comes to environmental activists. But now it can be in the ledger for its high emissions costs too.
Forest needed to cover carbon footprint of icy rescue By Matthew Theunissen - New Zealand Herald
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Adenine DNA Methylation May Affect Epigenetic Information
- Standards Needed For Post-Conviction Review Of Forensic Evidence
- Chipotle’s GMO Gimmick Turned Them Into The Public Face Of Science Illiteracy
- How Exceptional Teachers Use Creativity In The Classroom
- Researchers Capture What Thunder Looks Like - Yes, You Read That Right
- A physicist’s thoughts on life extension
- The Truth About 5 Common Health Beliefs
- "I remember as an idealistic kid reading “The Environmental Protection Hustle” and, although..."
- "Ah, you have to love the lame blogosphere. Doping at the Tour de France has most certainly helped..."
- "I agree. There are over 100 articles here that have been critical of atmospheric models yet all..."
- "Wait, who is accepting uncritically that increasing CO2 is the direct cause of climate changes..."
- "Agreed. At the lower end we have to experiment a little because we know what isn't working - but..."