Banner
    Number Of Facebook Friends Linked To Brain Structures
    By Gunnar De Winter | October 22nd 2011 07:59 AM | 2 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    About Gunnar

    Some people go through a 'why-phase' in their childhood, driving their parents utterly mad. In me, that phase never really ended. Needless to say...

    View Gunnar's Profile

    Social networks on the internet have grown greatly in the past few years. None more than the near ubiquitous Facebook, with over 800 million active users, half of which log in on any given day. Yet, there is great variability in the size of the online social networks of individual people. Is this correlated with the real-world networks of people? Does this have a neural basis? It are exactly these questions that were investigated in a new study, published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

    By collecting MRI scans of 125 healthy volunteers (independently replicating the experiments in a second dataset of 40 people) and having these people fill in a questionnaire, the researchers that authored the study had a look at both aforementioned questions. 

    Here’s what they found:

    • The number of Facebook friends correlated with the grey matter density in the left middle temporal gyrus, right superior temporal sulcus and the entorhinal cortex, areas implicated in social perception and associative memory (see figure 1).

       

    Figure 1: The main results replicated in an independent dataset of 40 individuals, illustrating the relationship between the number of Facebook friends and the grey matter density of (a) the left middle temporal gyrus, (b) the right superior temporal sulcus, and (c) the entorhinal cortex.

    (Source: Kanai et al., 2011)

       

    • A second observation was that the number of Facebook friends showed a correlation with several measures that indicate the size of real-life social networks (see figure 2).

       

    Figure 2: Correlations between the number of Facebook friends and the number of friends in the phonebook (Pho), to be invited to a party (Par), outside school (OS), within school (IS), present at a birthday party (BD), that receive a text message for a celebratory event (Txt), one would meet for a chat (Cha), and one could ask for a favour (Fav).

    (Source: Kanai et al., 2011) 

       

    Now, it is important to note that this study reveals a correlation, not a causal connection. So, at this moment, there is no evidence that using Facebook will increase the size of these brain areas or make you more sociable, as the authors themselves note:

    …our study was by design cross-sectional and so cannot determine whether the relationship between brain structure and social network participation arises over time through friendship-dependent plasticity in the brain areas involved; or alternatively whether individuals with a specific brain structure are predisposed to acquire more friends than others. The relative contributions of ‘nature’ and ‘nurture’ therefore remain to be determined.

    Overall, they conclude:

    Taken together, our findings demonstrate that the size of an individual’s online social network is closely linked to focal brain structure implicated in social cognition.

        

    Reference

    Kanai, R.;Bahrami, B.; Roylance, R. and Rees, G. (2011). Online social network size is reflected in human brain structure. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Published online 19 October. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1959.

    Comments

    Gerhard Adam
    Taken together, our findings demonstrate that the size of an individual’s online social network is closely linked to focal brain structure implicated in social cognition.
    So, in other words, it demonstrates a whole lot of nothing.  Since presumably "social cognition" is related to social networking, and real world social networking preceded Facebook networking, we simply have a restatement of what has been obvious and fully expected.  Of course, that's also assuming that 125 MRI scans and 40 other people (invariably all students) is representative of anything in the human brain.

    In addition, quotes like this don't help matters:
    "We cannot escape the ubiquity of the internet and its impact on our lives, yet we understand little of its impact on the brain, which we know is plastic and can change over time.  This new study illustrates how well-designed investigations can help us begin to understand whether or not our brains are evolving as they adapt to the challenges posed by social media.
    http://www.sciencecodex.com/read/number_of_facebook_friends_linked_to_size_of_brain_regions_study_suggests-79974
    Either he doesn't know what "evolve" means or he doesn't know what "plasticity" means.  In either case, it is a dumb thing to say and little wonder that people are becoming increasingly skeptical over these kinds of "findings".
    It strikes me that this data demonstrates (as is well known already) that Facebook "friends" are nothing of the sort. Just this generations way of collecting stamps. Notice the IS and BD data.
    True friends are flesh and blood, not an electronic echo chamber with some random AI thrown in to keep things interesting.

    Add a comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite><TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe><u><font>
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    CAPTCHA
    If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.