With over one-third of American children overweight, the search is on to figure out why. Happy Meals get blamed, as do sodas, trans fats and just about everything else.
A new study even blames television - not necessarily how much time is spent watching it, but having it in the bedroom. The paper in JAMA associated a bedroom television with weight gain in children and adolescents, and say it is unrelated to the time they spend watching.
Their evidence: a telephone survey in 2003 of 6,522 boys and girls (ages 10 to 14 years) that asked about bedroom televisions. Body mass index (BMI) at two and four years after baseline was based on self-report and parent-reported weight and height for their children. They found that an estimated 71 percent of children and adolescents (ages 8 to 18 years) have bedroom televisions.
Diane Gilbert-Diamond, Sc.D., of the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, N.H., and colleagues report that, at baseline, 59.1 percent of the children surveyed reported having a bedroom television.
It's pretty good to be poor in America because more poor and minority kids have bedroom televisions. Boys also have them more than girls. Having a bedroom television was associated with an excess BMI of 0.57 at two years and 0.75 at four years of follow-up, and a BMI gain of 0.24 between years two and four.
The authors speculate the association could possibly be due to disrupted sleep patterns or greater exposure to child-targeted food advertising, although their analysis did not investigate causal reasons.
“This study suggests that removing bedroom televisions may be an important step in our nation’s fight against child obesity. … This work underscores the need for interventional studies to explore whether removing televisions from child bedrooms results in lower adiposity (fat) gain," they wrote.
Citation: JAMA Pediatrics March 3, 2014, doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.3921
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Could You See Moon City Lights Or A Greenhouse From Earth? Just For Fun
- Mother Jones Hates Scientists - And Their Bias Shows
- The Alleged Perversion of Geoff Marcy and Sexual Harassment.
- The Plot Of The Week: Light New Bosons Below The J/Psi
- Hand And Arm Movement To Quadriplegic Patients Restored
- 'Blind Analysis' Used In Physics Could Reduce Bias In Social And Life Sciences Papers
- To Make EU Food Sector Renewable Energy Viable, Less Meat And More...organic Veggies?
- "It’s interesting (and telling) that MJ is saying they “won” the case and that this is a case..."
- "Thanks! I've rewritten it to: The other bit of information we need is that with each increase..."
- "You don't know me, you don't know anything about me - but if you were not reflexively defending..."
- "Yes, it's a unfortunate place for that event. The problem is that the dimuon mass cannot be smaller..."
- "And this author thinks he's a superior voice for truth when he writes this total BS?: Unlike Mother..."
- ACSH Talks Science Outreach At The Western Plant Health Association Meeting
- OxyContin-for-Kids Debate, Now National, Intensifies
- Golden Rice Moves Closer to Reality in Asia
- C. Diff. Can Be Controlled, With Relative Ease
- FDA-Approved Test for Meningitis is a Home Run
- Trends In Smoking – Chinese Men In Peril, American Women Get Better Cessation
- Think twice about Android root
- One direction: Researchers grow nanocircuitry with semiconducting graphene nanoribbons
- Drop off feared in the number of physicians conducting research
- Hubble's planetary portrait captures new changes in Jupiter's Great Red Spot
- Comet Encke: A solar windsock observed by NASA's STEREO