Banner
    'Cash For Clunkers' Program Is 10X As Expensive For CO2 Emissions As Alternatives
    By News Staff | August 14th 2009 12:00 AM | 5 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    The knock on drastic global warming mitigation solutions by detractors is that it may end up being expensive and not accomplish much - the classic government scenario.

    'Cash for Clunkers' is an example of that, according to new UC Davis estimates which say the federal government's 'Cash for Clunkers' program is paying at least 10 times the sticker price to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide.

    And that's in comparison to carbon credits, already unlikely to work.   Carbon credits are projected to sell in the U.S. for about $28 per ton (today's price in Europe was $20) so even the best-case calculation of the cost of the clunkers rebate is $237 per ton, said UC Davis transportation economist Christopher Knittel.

    "When burned, a gallon of gasoline creates roughly 20 pounds of carbon dioxide. I combined that known value with an average rebate of $4,200 and a range of assumptions about the fuel economy of the new vehicles purchased and how long the clunkers would have been on the road if not for the program," Knittel said. "I even assumed drivers didn't change their habits, although some analysts have suggested that the owners of new vehicles will drive more than they would have with their old cars.

    "In the end, the lowest cost to remove one ton of carbon from the environment was $237. More likely scenarios produced a cost of more than $500 per ton, even when we accounted for reductions in pollutants other than greenhouse gases. That suggests the Cash for Clunkers program is an expensive way to reduce carbon."

    Knittel did not analyze the program's other key objectives: stimulating the economy and providing relief for automobile manufacturers.

    Comments

    OK I get it, thats true, but heres the real deal. Try getting your average american to give a bleep. Don't get me wrong I personally want to get the most out of my civic and get an electric car later but the people I know couldn't care less and this program appeals to them gets them in a more efficient thing. Its a good a thing. Carbon dioxide may be the problem but the average guy doesn't care so we have to trick the average into a more efficient lifestyle.

    Hank
    Government policies based on trickery will not go far.   If we combined the money wasted on ethanol with the money wasted on cash for clunkers and put it into research, alternative energy sources would be on track.   Instead the next move will be to porkbarrel more junk tech like solar panels and wind farms.
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind
    Doesn't this depend on assumptions about the kind of car that a consumer will buy? If someone buys a Toyota Prius, which gets more than 50 miles per gallon, then the numbers would look a lot better:

    http://www.driv4.com/watch.php?v=932

    Gerhard Adam
    Maybe I'm way off here, but it seems that this program was never really intended to deal with carbon emissions as it was a means to stimulate auto buying and put some cash in the hands of consumers without tax cuts.
    outsidethebox

    Cash for clunkers is good for America. Not for Individuals with cars that get good mileage and want to trade up. But good for the USA. Be a patriot and support something that works even if you or I don't personally benefit from a new car like some Americans will. Since this started gasoline prices have stabilized and the economic mess we got into was from rapid high fuel prices. With clunkers off the road consumption will decrease and prices will stabilize. There isn't enough storage for the fuel right now, if we keep decreasing usage we will have a better economy. As the new electric cars come on line they will help stabilizes the price of fuel. We really don't need fuel prices to get out of hand like it did again. I personally modified a car to get 50+ mpg the previous mpg was 20-25 mpg. But most of us are too lazy, or just can't figure it out, or don't care. That's where this program comes in to help a dumb as dirt public that has an negative effect on all of us by creating higher fuel prices.

    Russell Ade Scientist Simple Solutions for Complex Problems