Banner
    Psychic Healers May Simply Have Synesthesia
    By News Staff | May 11th 2012 09:34 AM | 5 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    People who claim to see the 'aura' of others - and subsequently claim they can modify them - may actually have synesthesia, according to new research.

    Synesthesia is believed to occur due to cross-wiring in the brain; synesthetes have more synaptic connections than 'normal' people and some are interconnected in ways others are not, including across brain regions. Since the brain regions responsible for the processing of each type of sensory stimuli are intensely interconnected, synesthetes see or taste a sound, feel a taste, or associate people with a particular color.

    A new paper in Consciousness and Cognition is the first time that a scientific explanation is attempted for this esoteric aura, a supposed energy field of luminous radiation surrounding a person as a halo, which is imperceptible to most human beings but healers claim they can detect. University of Granada Department of Experimental Psychology researchers Óscar Iborra, Luis Pastor and Emilio Gómez Milán state, "Not all healers are synesthetes, but there is a higher prevalence of this phenomenon among them. The same occurs among painters and artists, for example".


    Credit: Shutterstock

    For the paper, the researchers interviewed synesthetes like "Esteban Sánchez Casas", known as "El Santón de Baza", who claim to be able to see and heal the auras of people.

    Some people attribute 'paranormal powers to El Santón, such as his ability to see the aura of people "but, in fact, it is a clear case of synesthesia", the researchers explain. El Santón presents schizotypy (certain personality traits in healthy people involving slight paranoia and delusions), face-color synesthesia (the brain region responsible for face recognition is associated with the color-processing region); touch-mirror synesthesia (when the synesthete observes a person who is being touched or is experiencing pain, s/he experiences the same) and high empathy (the ability to feel what other person is feeling). "These capacities make synesthetes have the ability to make people feel understood, and provide them with special emotion and pain reading skills", the researchers explain.

    In the light of the results obtained, the researchers remark the significant "placebo effect" that healers have on people, "though some healers really have the ability to see people's auras and feel the pain in others due to synesthesia". Some healers "have abilities and attitudes that make them believe in their ability to heal other people, but it is actually a case of self-deception, as synesthesia is not an extrasensory power, but a subjective and 'adorned' perception of reality", the researchers state.


    E.G. Milána, O. Iborraa, M. Hochela, M.A. Rodríguez Artachoa, L.C. Delgado-Pastora, E. Salazara, A. González-Hernández, 'Auras in mysticism and synaesthesia: a comparison', Consciousness and cognition, 2012, 21(1), 258-268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.11.010

    Comments

    Tony Fleming
    Forget the psychic healers, as a bioeffect researcher, I and my bioelectromagnetics colleagues have long studied the induced 'aura' of people due to mobile phones and other devices such as hand-held RADAR devices.  These are examples of induced electromagnetic fields due to EM devices. But there are also biogenic EM fields (fields created within the body) that surround and permeate the body.  Our cells for example are replicated by the action of these 'internal' electromagnetic fields.   A small proportion of people are electrosensitive and magnetosensitive to electric and magnetic fields. This is an ailment rather than an ability. People who are ( or claim to be) healers may have a sensitivity that is not an ailment but a particular insight that many do not possess.  Synaesthesia may perhaps be the basis of some of these healers. But there is a simple explanation of these fields besides 'self-deception'; au contraire I suggest the authors should investigate the recent progress in mathematical physics that has taken place over the past decade.

    Using (the current versions of) quantum theory we have no ability to describe such auras.  This is the 'atomic chemistry' known by mainstream science. However there is now a mathematical formulation (self-field theory) that can indeed give us a quantitative description of the fields between objects, similar to the reaction of the binding energy between atoms that we call molecules. This is called 'photon chemistry' a level of description below current quantum formulations. These interactions are the basis of what the article refers to as auras but which we can also refer to as 'biofields' or 'bodyfields'.

      
    Tony Fleming Biophotonics Research Institute tfleming@unifiedphysics.com
    Hank
    Promotion and marketing are in violation of the terms of the FAQ - and 100% of your articles and comments are just that - so please read it.
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind
    Richard King

    Tony, I wrote alongish response to this article but, me being me, I wanted to go over it “one more time” before posting it but, as I was going to be away for a day or so, I left it for completion on my return. However, I caught up with your commentwhile staying in Bournemouth, so thought Ishould respond.

    I am a healer as well as having a strong science background, so, although the heavily biasedmaterialistic mainstreamers will always disagree, I do know what I am talking about. Even if your research shows things along the lines that you describe, there is far more to “what is” than that into which you have, so far, delved.

     “Using (the current versions of) quantumtheory we have no ability to describe such auras.”

    On the contrary, a theory based on QCD seems to make sense to someone like me who is aware of such energy fields and has a degree of understanding of quantum mechanics, even though it is not my specialist area. There are other interpretations of QM that are a very good fit with higher level experiences in general. The QM approachto the non-physical fields connected with the human body also seems to produce results which agree with the experiences, perceptions, diagnosis, etc., of different types of healer, as well as physiotherapists, mainstream physical medicine practitioners, etc.

    “People who are ( or claim to be) healers may have a sensitivity that is not an ailment but a particular insight that many donot possess.”

    It is certainly not an ailment, quite the reverse, and it is, in a sense, an insight that many do not posses, though, more accurately it is an insight that many are not aware that they possess, though actually do if only they took the trouble to access it; it is part ofthe fundamental nature of all of us.

    Everyone has the basic abilities. To a large extent it is down to awareness, or lack of it.

    I do not particularly blame you for endeavouring to use your approach to explain such matters; the materialistic, scientistic types, among others, frequently do that; it is human nature to fitthings to what you know than to contemplate that there may be things you do notknow, or understand. That does not mean that they are so.

    “These interactions are the basis of what the article refers to as auras but which we can also refer to as 'biofields' or'bodyfields'.”

    There seems to be an implication in those words that the energy field referred to as the aura is aproduct of biological processes; in our knowledge and experience the converseis the case.

    Tony Fleming
    Hi Richard
    Thanks for your comments. Sorry if I gave you a wrong impression, I'm sure we very similar in our views of psychic or spiritual healing. Certainly on the same side of the fence at any rate.

    First let me say Hank, I will try not to offend the FAQ of the website. Maybe a bit tricky but let me try to learn to walk on eggshells. By not being as explicit about my own work as I have been in the past. A habit is hard to throw off. But I'll try.

    Actually Richard I was defending psychic healing from the materialistic view expressed in the article, where it is said to be a form of 'self-delusion'.  If you read my comment again you will find that I do NOT put psychic healing into the materialistic basket (yes I do tend to think of spirit as connected to the materialistic). Mathematics covers fractals which are infinite in their structure. There is reason to believe the photon, and indeed physics may have a fractal structure with domains ranging from beneath the photon to the multiverse and beyond.  

    I am personally aware that healers are REAL, they have an ability; as you say "Everyone has the basic abilities. To a large extent it is down to awareness, or lack of it." No I have not been treated by healers but it has been a part of my work as a bioeffects researcher, especially being a member of the Bioelectromagnetics Society (BEMS) (hope this isn't called 'promotion' Hank) where this debate has been aired on a regular basis over the years. In fact my daughter suffers from a form of muscular dystrophy and does use psychic healers AND gets relief via this ministry.   I know many people who regularly use psychic healing with effect. I myself have discovered that I possess an ability to use water dowsers I won't call this 'divining' for the same reason I did not like the term 'aura' being used in the context of this article. I see many authors who put down unknown effects as 'self-delusion' or 'placebo' as you rightly say. 

    These effects are not beyond our understanding, even if they are spiritual in nature. However science has long left metaphysics out of its scope and mandate;  science was called 'natural philosophy' in times past. There is a connection between all levels of matter and field that is currently being overlooked within science.

    "There seems to be an implication in those words that the energy field referred to as the aura is a product of biological processes; in our knowledge and experience the converse is the case."


    Richard I'm not sure I understand what you are saying here, could you explain further please. What do you mean by your words above? I do see biofields as extending outside the body and therefore being a possible part-explanation for the well-known auras of historical times (e.g. holy paintings and icons). These 'halos' may contain biological fields but they may contain other fields of unknown origin. My point is that the spiritual and the materialistic sit side-by-side in a holistic fashion.

    It is certainly not an ailment, quite the reverse, and it is, in a sense, an insight that many do not posses, though, more accurately it is an insight that many are not aware that they possess, though actually do if only they took the trouble to access it; it is part ofthe fundamental nature of all of us.
    I've have people write to me about their electro- or magneto-sensitivity. And this can be an ailment.  One poor lady could not wear wristwatches presumably because of her biogenic magnetite. My wife who had a brain tumour removed is electrosensitive and will get headaches with a radio near her head at night.  What is apparent is  that what can be harmful can also be helpful. "One man's meat is another's poison".  What I mean here is that radiofrequency can be used to treat cancer but in exactly the same way it can also be used to damage tissues.

    Yes, I had no idea of my dowsing ability until it was demonstrated to me on a trip to Atlanta by a native American who explained to me how in older times tribes would seek rivers etc near their camp sites. The Australian aborigines and probably other nomadic tribes also possessed such water finding skills that we today do not recognize or understand.

    Finally my comment also pointed out the difference between a field-level mathematics and a particle-level mathematics where the photon has no mass only energy, which gives it no structure except for the Dirac delta function, the singularity at a point. 



    Tony Fleming Biophotonics Research Institute tfleming@unifiedphysics.com
    Richard King
    Hi Tony,
    Jo, my wife, and I were at the Trouville Hotel, Bournemouth, for a break way from home, when I saw your post and responded, but have been very busy since we got back. I also had problems with my Virgin Media broadband, which did not help and is, still, barely working, and very “hit and miss”.

    “Actually Richard I was defending psychic healing from the materialistic view expressed in the article, where it is said to be a form of 'self-delusion'. If you read my comment again you will find that I do NOT put psychic healing into the materialistic basket (yes I do tend to think of spirit as connected to the materialistic). Mathematics covers fractals which are infinite in their structure. There is reason to believe the photon, and indeed physics may have a fractal structure with domains ranging from beneath the photon to the multiverse and beyond.”

    I sought of assumed that was your position, read some of your post as a mixture of that and more the mainstream position, maybe incorrectly, and responded as if it was closer to the latter than the former. Given the conductivity of our bodies and the various currents flowing through them, there must be magnetic fields associated with the body. I was starting to think that you were beginning to explain what healers perceive as something along those lines, though erroneously it seems. The approach of a Yoga teacher I used to know also coloured my thinking when I was responding. She used to describe the aura to her clients as a magnetic field emanating from the body because, apparently, for cultural religious, reasons the term “etheric field” was not soemthign that was acceptable to them. They certainly would not have understood a tensor concept, let aloen the added extras in relation to that type of description of such field, e.g. Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Chromo Dynamics, which is not my specialist field but I can handle the concepts.

    “I am personally aware that healers are REAL, they have an ability; as you say "Everyone has the basic abilities. To a large extent it is down to awareness, or lack of it." No I have not been treated by healers but it has been a part of my work as a bioeffects researcher, especially being a member of the Bioelectromagnetics Society (BEMS) (hope this isn't called 'promotion' Hank) where this debate has been aired on a regular basis over the years. In fact my daughter suffers from a form of muscular dystrophy and does use psychic healers AND gets relief via this ministry. I know many people who regularly use psychic healing with effect. I myself have discovered that I possess an ability to use water dowsers I won't call this 'divining' for the same reason I did not like the term 'aura' being used in the context of this article. I see many authors who put down unknown effects as 'self-delusion' or 'placebo' as you rightly say.”

    I am uncomfortable with the use of the word “ministry” in relation to spiritual healing as it implies religion of the dogma kind and spiritual healing is related to Real Reality, as opposed to physical reality, or any other kind of reality, that which Really Is, rather than that which is perceived to be in the more limited perception sense. (The capitalisations are deliberate.) I regard that which is Spiritual to be beyond religion, dogma, or anything else; it is the fundamental Is, or at least represents It.

    Putting such matters down to self delusion, or placebo, is the easy way out. The mainstream people have to be right and circumstances have to be arranged to accommodate that; hence useful get outs like delusion and placebo. As far as the physical is concerned, the illusion is with them but they will never accept that, at least not until they go Home, when they have no choice to accept, realise.

    “These effects are not beyond our understanding, even if they are spiritual in nature. However science has long left metaphysics out of its scope and mandate; science was called 'natural philosophy' in times past. There is a connection between all levels of matter and field that is currently being overlooked within science.”

    Agreed, to a large extent; mainstream science leaves out that which it cannot explain because those people who propound it have to be “on top”, have to be right, all knowledgeable. I am aware of the history and origins of science but, these days, it seems to have been hijacked, to a large extent, by the atheistic, materialistic know alls and turned into scientism, which I regard as a religion in its own right, along with its own high priests, infallibility, dogma, etc. scientism is not science, it is a way of life, way of thinking, way of believing that is based on a hijacked, limited version of science. The latter comment is more for other readers than yourself, Tony.

    Re:
    "There seems to be an implication in those words that the energy field referred to as the aura is a product of biological processes; in our knowledge and experience the converse is the case."

    And:
    “Richard I'm not sure I understand what you are saying here, could you explain further please.”

    The concept which is far beyond the grasp of mainstreamers is that the non-physical bodies do not emanate from the physical body, the converse is the case. There is little point in trying to explain it to them, there are levels of understanding which one can accept, grasp, or not, as the case may be.

    “It is certainly not an ailment, quite the reverse, and it is, in a sense, an insight that many do not posses, though, more accurately it is an insight that many are not aware that they possess, though actually do if only they took the trouble to access it; it is part ofthe fundamental nature of all of us.”

    Agreed.

    “I've have people write to me about their electro- or magneto-sensitivity. And this can be an ailment.”

    I can, sort of, accept that, though what some, most (?) consider an ailment, others consider part of that lifetime’s experience.

    “My wife who had a brain tumour removed is electrosensitive and will get headaches with a radio near her head at night. What is apparent is that what can be harmful can also be helpful. ‘One man's meat is another's poison’. What I mean here is that radiofrequency can be used to treat cancer but in exactly the same way it can also be used to damage tissues.”

    We are all different and various things affect each of us in different ways, even on the higher levels. For example, I had an exhilarating experience in the 1990s while with a healer, David. A certain long term (many millennia long term) “friend” turned up and showed me her true nature; the energies involved were phenomenal. To me it was like a glorious invigorating shower of those energies, while David, I later learned, apart from wondering what was going on, felt as if his “head was lifting off”. It seems that I can take those types of energies, comfortably, at levels at least an order of magnitude, more like two orders of magnitude, stronger than the “average healer”.

    It seems fairly “obvious” that various types of EM radiation will have an affect on our bodies given their structure, conductivity, etc.; how, why and how much is, equally obviously, open to dispute.

    “Yes, I had no idea of my dowsing ability until it was demonstrated to me on a trip to Atlanta by a native American who explained to me how in older times tribes would seek rivers etc near their camp sites. The Australian aborigines and probably other nomadic tribes also possessed such water finding skills that we today do not recognize or understand.”

    The more “primitive” the ways of various peoples compared with Western “civilisation” and culture, the closer they seem to be with what Really Is and the greater their abilities in that respect.

    “Finally my comment also pointed out the difference between a field-level mathematics and a particle-level mathematics where the photon has no mass only energy, which gives it no structure except for the Dirac delta function, the singularity at a point.”

    When I completed my Degree at Brunel University in 1971 my mathematical ability would have been not to far from the Dirac equations; it certainly went as far as delta functions. A lot of “rust” has set in since then, as far as mathematics is concerned, though I managed to get quite a long way through Roger Penrose’s book “The Road to Reality” before I ran into the sand, so to speak.