Nearly forgotten research from decades ago complicates the task of quantifying earthquake hazards in the Pacific Northwest, according to a new report.
The report focuses on the Cascadia subduction zone—a giant active fault that slants eastward beneath the Pacific coast of southern British Columbia, Washington, Oregon, and northern California.
Geologic studies in the past three decades have provided increasingly specific estimates of Cascadia earthquake sizes and repeat times. The estimates affect public safety through seismic provisions in building design and tsunami limits on evacuation maps.
The new report does not question whether the Cascadia subduction zone repeatedly produces enormous earthquakes. What the report asks instead is how much geologists can say, with confidence, about the history of those earthquake going back thousands of years. How big was each of the earthquakes? Did they occur twice as often along one part of the subduction zone as another? The report concludes that extracting such details from deep-sea sediments is more complicated than was previously thought.
The report reappraises sediment cores that were collected near the foot of the continental slope offshore Washington. A subset of cores from this area underpins influential estimates of Cascadia earthquake size and recurrence that were published in 2012. The new report points to confounding evidence from a much larger suite of cores that were collected and first analyzed by University of Washington and Oregon State University scientists in the late 1960s and early 1970s.
Those Nixon-era cores were the work of researchers unconcerned with earthquakes. Plate tectonics was then such a new idea that scientists were just beginning to recognize the Cascadia subduction zone as a tectonic plate boundary.
The sediment cores were collected to learn about turbidites—beds of sand and mud laid down by bottom-hugging, sediment-driven currents that infrequently emerged from submarine canyons onto the deep ocean floor.
Not until a 1990 report would turbidites be reinterpreted as clues to Cascadia earthquake history.
Source: Brian F. Atwater, Bobb Carson, Gary B. Griggs, H. Paul Johnson, Marie S. Salmi, 'Rethinking turbidite paleoseismology along the Cascadia subduction zone', Geology 29 July 2014, doi: 10.1130/G35902.1
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Men With Short Index Fingers And Long Ring Fingers Are Nicer To Women
- Big Data Tackles How Urban Movement Is Linked To Social Activity
- Cruithne: Earth's Other 'Moon' Could Reveal Mysteries Of The Solar System
- What Does Your Gut Microbiome Have To Do With Your Immune System?
- Statistical Mechanics Reveals The Ideal Hideout During A Zombie Takeover
- Creepy IBM AI toy coming for Christmas—the Continuum paradox. Eerie IBM video link below.
- Global Warming Pause Caused By Interaction Of Atlantic And Pacific Oscillations
- "The Chinese herb Radix . . . rather incomplete, since that simply means Root (of). A bit of..."
- "My wife showed me this picture on her I-phone and thought I was crazy for saying it was blue. I..."
- "New Science not peer reviewed. Graham Lawton where are your credentials? Who are these scientists..."
- "Very much enjoyed the article.Currently I am abstaining from added sugar due to lack of interest..."
- "David:Thanks for clarifying what conservative means in this context. Conserving energy is..."
- Zombie outbreak? Statistical mechanics reveals the ideal hideout
- Study challenges theory on unconscious memory system, links hippocampus to unconscious memory
- Saving energy: Increasing oil flow in the keystone pipeline with electric fields
- Experts warn of stem cell underuse as transplants reach 1 million worldwide
- Feast or famine diet could extend longevity