Nearly forgotten research from decades ago complicates the task of quantifying earthquake hazards in the Pacific Northwest, according to a new report.
The report focuses on the Cascadia subduction zone—a giant active fault that slants eastward beneath the Pacific coast of southern British Columbia, Washington, Oregon, and northern California.
Geologic studies in the past three decades have provided increasingly specific estimates of Cascadia earthquake sizes and repeat times. The estimates affect public safety through seismic provisions in building design and tsunami limits on evacuation maps.
The new report does not question whether the Cascadia subduction zone repeatedly produces enormous earthquakes. What the report asks instead is how much geologists can say, with confidence, about the history of those earthquake going back thousands of years. How big was each of the earthquakes? Did they occur twice as often along one part of the subduction zone as another? The report concludes that extracting such details from deep-sea sediments is more complicated than was previously thought.
The report reappraises sediment cores that were collected near the foot of the continental slope offshore Washington. A subset of cores from this area underpins influential estimates of Cascadia earthquake size and recurrence that were published in 2012. The new report points to confounding evidence from a much larger suite of cores that were collected and first analyzed by University of Washington and Oregon State University scientists in the late 1960s and early 1970s.
Those Nixon-era cores were the work of researchers unconcerned with earthquakes. Plate tectonics was then such a new idea that scientists were just beginning to recognize the Cascadia subduction zone as a tectonic plate boundary.
The sediment cores were collected to learn about turbidites—beds of sand and mud laid down by bottom-hugging, sediment-driven currents that infrequently emerged from submarine canyons onto the deep ocean floor.
Not until a 1990 report would turbidites be reinterpreted as clues to Cascadia earthquake history.
Source: Brian F. Atwater, Bobb Carson, Gary B. Griggs, H. Paul Johnson, Marie S. Salmi, 'Rethinking turbidite paleoseismology along the Cascadia subduction zone', Geology 29 July 2014, doi: 10.1130/G35902.1
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Chipotle’s GMO Gimmick Turned Them Into The Public Face Of Science Illiteracy
- The Neuroscience Reason We Fall Over When Drunk
- A physicist’s thoughts on life extension
- Galaxy EGS-zs8-1 - 13 Billion Years Old
- Does This Cow Really Exist?
- Environmental Studies Courses Need More Diversity Of Thought
- Stuff Worth Reading: Collider Asymmetries, Dark Photons, And Warp Drives
- "It lists % of meals and then calories. I can't imagine anyone would not understand that. Do we..."
- "How can you call your website Science 2.0 and not label your x and y axis on your bar graph? Even..."
- "Hi Tommaso, despite a lot of rumors and (more or less) good advertising what you are hinting is..."
- "It's something of a weakness for them when the only defense is 'you haven't excluded it at this..."
- "Math has more degrees of freedom than physics. Hence theoreticians can make many theories of physics..."