Banner
    Seeing Is Believing? You Still Won't Believe This Gravitational Arc
    By News Staff | June 27th 2012 06:00 AM | 3 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    Astronomers have found a puzzling arc of light behind an extremely massive cluster of galaxies residing 10 billion light-years away. The galactic grouping was observed when the universe was roughly a quarter of its current age of 13.7 billion years and the giant arc is the stretched shape of a more distant galaxy whose light is distorted by the monster cluster's powerful gravity, the effect called gravitational lensing.

    The puzzle is, the arc shouldn't exist.

    Galaxy clusters are collections of hundreds to thousands of galaxies bound together by gravity. They are the most massive structures in our universe and astronomers frequently study galaxy clusters to look for faraway, magnified galaxies behind them that would otherwise be too dim to see with telescopes.  The surprise is spotting a galaxy lensed by an extremely distant cluster. Dubbed IDCS J1426.5+3508, the cluster is the most massive found at that epoch, weighing as much as 500 trillion suns. It is 5 to 10 times larger than other clusters found at such an early time in the universe's history. The team spotted the cluster in a search using NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope in combination with archival optical images taken as part of the National Optical Astronomy Observatory's Deep Wide Field Survey at the Kitt Peak National Observatory, Tucson, Ariz. The combined images allowed them to see the cluster as a grouping of very red galaxies, indicating they are far away.

    This unique system constitutes the most distant cluster known to "host" a giant gravitationally lensed arc. Finding this ancient gravitational arc may yield insight into how, during the first moments after the big bang, conditions were set up for the growth of hefty clusters in the early universe.


    The arc was spotted in optical images of the cluster taken in 2010 by Hubble's Advanced Camera for Surveys. The infrared capabilities of Hubble's Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) helped provide a precise distance, confirming it to be one of the farthest clusters yet discovered.

    J1426.5+3508 gravitational lens
    CLICK FOR LARGER SIZE. The puzzling arc of light behind an extremely massive cluster of galaxies residing 10 billion light-years away. The giant arc is the stretched shape of a more distant galaxy whose light is distorted by the monster cluster's powerful gravity - gravitational lensing.  Credit: NASA, ESA, A. Gonzalez (University of Florida, Gainsville), M. Brodwin (University of Missouri-Kansas City), and A. Stanford (University of California at Davis))

    "When I first saw it, I kept staring at it, thinking it would go away," said study leader Anthony Gonzalez of the University of Florida in Gainesville. "According to a statistical analysis, arcs should be extremely rare at that distance. At that early epoch, the expectation is that there are not enough galaxies behind the cluster bright enough to be seen, even if they were 'lensed' or distorted by the cluster. The other problem is that galaxy clusters become less massive the farther back in time you go. So it's more difficult to find a cluster with enough mass to be a good lens for gravitationally bending the light from a distant galaxy."

    Once the astronomers determined the cluster's distance, they used Hubble, the Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy (CARMA) radio telescope, and NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory to independently show that the galactic grouping is extremely massive.

    CARMA helped the astronomers determine the cluster's mass by measuring how primordial light from the big bang was affected as it passed through the extremely hot, tenuous gas that permeates the grouping. The astronomers then used the WFC3 observations to map the cluster's mass by calculating how much cluster mass was needed to produce the gravitational arc. Chandra data, which revealed the cluster's brightness in X-rays, was also used to measure the cluster's mass.

    "The chance of finding such a gigantic cluster so early in the universe was less than one percent in the small area we surveyed," said team member Mark Brodwin of the University of Missouri-Kansas City. "It shares an evolutionary path with some of the most massive clusters we see today, including the Coma Cluster and the recently discovered El Gordo Cluster."

    An analysis of the arc revealed that the lensed object is a star-forming galaxy that existed 10 billion to 13 billion years ago. The team hopes to use Hubble again to obtain a more accurate distance to the lensed galaxy.

    Gonzalez has considered several possible explanations for the arc.

    One explanation is that distant galaxy clusters, unlike nearby clusters, have denser concentrations of galaxies at their cores, making them better magnifying glasses. However, even if the distant cores were denser, the added bulk still should not provide enough gravitational muscle to produce the giant arc seen in Gonzalez's observations, according to a statistical analysis.

    Another possibility is that the initial microscopic fluctuations in matter made right after the big bang were different from those predicted by standard cosmological simulations, and therefore produced more massive clusters than expected.

    "I'm not yet convinced by any of these explanations," Gonzalez said. "After all, we have found only one example. We really need to study more extremely massive galaxy clusters that existed between 8 billion and 10 billion years ago to see how many more gravitationally lensed objects we can find."


    Results published in The Astrophysical Journal.

    Comments

    Okay, someone really needs to do some independent reporting/journalism on this story. I have scoured the web for more information, and this same EXACT (copy+paste) article comes up on every site. As a scientist, there are troubling ambiguities/omissions from the account: "According to statistical analysis, arcs should be extremely rare at that distance." How rare? If we're talking 1/100, then okay; but if we're talking 1/10^20, then the assumptions via which we have established the odds are incorrect. Further: "The chance of finding such a gigantic cluster so early in the universe was less than one percent in the small area we surveyed," While this statement is true, it is misleading. For researchers to state this object "shouldn't exist" means the odds are much LESS than 1%. The precise nature of those odds is crucial for understanding the challenges this object presents for standard theory of cosmology.

    Hank
    I think you just did the journalism.  Sign up and write an article.  This is a press release, just like it says - which is why you will find it in numerous places that NASA sends it to, in order to get publicity for their work.
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind
    Tony Fleming
    This raises questions as to how the Universe formed, whether there was a merging of smaller entities into larger entities (conventional thinking as at 2004), or was it perhaps the other way around

    However, there is an interesting third alternative: did the gravitational and particle hierarchy already exist within the 'cosmic egg' (the Ylem of mythology, a term used by Gamow and Alpher)? and therefore did the gravitational structure emerge top-down, simultaneously with the emergence of the particle structure bottom-up (nucleosynthesis) as the energy density fell following the Big Bang. 

    In other words there may have been both a top-down hierarchy of gravitational structure, and a concomitant bottom-up formation of the particle structure. Which raises the possibility of a future 'cosmostasis' (associated with 'cosmostatic' solutions).

    (Actually it was probably much more complex, perhaps more like a 'wave' of creation-annihilation-creation of the particle structure. Was the 'egg' a conglomerate of quarks and gluons, or was it a sea of sub-photonic radiation-the inflationary period? Or was it both?) and where does the Higgs fit into this?

    We suspect these massive cluster structures were amongst the earliest gravitational structures to have evolved i.e. solar systems most recent (say 5 Billion years ago), galaxies older (earlier to evolve), then clusters oldest (earliest to evolve)? 

    Second, do we have enough definition to see if this 'arc' is in fact an  'arc' that includes very hot galaxies? Or is it just an arc of light? (and why the mention of gravitational lensing?)


    sorry for so many questions.
    Tony Fleming Biophotonics Research Institute tfleming@unifiedphysics.com