Banner
    Silymarin: Herbal Remedy For Hepatitis C Does Not Work
    By News Staff | July 19th 2012 12:08 PM | 7 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    Silymarin is an extract of milk thistle. Millions of people use this herbal remedy to treat chronic liver disease but it doesn't do much for patients, according to a new study.

    Milk thistle fruit extracts have been widely used by patients in treating liver disease based on previous evidence showing that it has anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, and potentially anti-viral properties so the new study set out to assess true efficacy in a group of hepatitis C patients who were previously unsuccessfully treated with interferon-based therapy – the standard anti-viral method used to treat the disease. 

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 3.2 million persons in the United States have chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection - 33 percent of those people have reported current or past use of silymarin to treat the disease. The new study was designed to measure the potential benefit of increasing doses of silymarin in patients with chronic HCV. To determine efficacy, researchers monitored levels of serum alaninie aminotransferase (ALT) – the enzyme found in the blood stream that is most often tested to identify liver disease. Low levels of ALT are normally found in the blood, but are elevated when the liver is damaged or diseased. Secondary outcomes included quality-of-life measures. 


    The trial, which included 154 adult participants with chronic HCV, was conducted over the course of two years at four medical centers in the United States. Participants were randomly assigned to receive 420mg silymarin, 700mg silymarin or a matching placebo administered three times/week for 24 weeks, a standard duration of treatment. After 24 weeks, researchers found only two participants in each treatment group achieved lowered ALT levels. Neither the average decline in ALT activity nor quality-of-life measures at the end of treatment differed significantly across the treatment groups.

    "By all indications, silymarin is no more effective at treating hepatitis C related chronic liver disease, in those who failed standard therapy with interferon, than a placebo," said K. Rajender Reddy, MD, professor of Medicine and medical director of Liver Transplantation at Penn Medicine, and senior author of the study. "This is a landmark study as millions of people around the world are looking for supplements and other forms of alternative medicines to help reduce ALT levels every year. "These data show that even higher-than-normal doses of silymarin don't significantly reduce ALT levels for patients with HCV."


    The doses used in the trial were three and five times higher than the customary dose. "At the end of the trial we saw no significant changes in physical or mental health assessments between the patients who received treatment, and those who did not. Quality-of-life measures were also largely unchanged."

    Published in The Journal of the American Medical Association

    Comments

    Bonny Bonobo alias Brat
    "By all indications, silymarin is no more effective at treating hepatitis C related chronic liver disease, in those who failed standard therapy with interferon, than a placebo," said K. Rajender Reddy, MD, professor of Medicine and medical director of Liver Transplantation at Penn Medicine, and senior author of the study. 
    Yes, but is silymarin or milk thistle extract effective on people who haven't failed standard therapy with interferon? Maybe these patients in thsi study were very severe cases, or unusual in some other way? What about the less severe cases that would normally respond to interferon, would they also respond to silymarin? I remember once reading a study that showed silymarin was a good alternative treatment for treating liver disease in Russian alcoholics but it was quite a long time ago.
    Make love not war
    UvaE
    It's too bad that it doesn't work for chronic cases of hepatitis C. But it should be pointed out that silymarin is still a valuable herb in treating other conditions. For instance it does work better than previously used treatments for Amanita phalloides  poisoning (death cap mushroom)
    Regarding a new clinical study: Effect of Silymarin (Milk Thistle) on Liver Disease in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C – Published by JAMA, July 18, 2012 – http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1217238

    One can conclude that there is little value in the findings of this current study that can be applied to the majority of patients with chronic hepatitis C.

    See: http://www.salamresearch.net/2012/07/new-study-on-effect-of-silymarin-fo...

    These results say very little and are inconclusive for most chronic hepatitis C patients.

    It is widely known that ALT rates fluctuate often. Therefore, any small difference in randomized samples for placebo or silymarin controls is of little significance.
    • If the ALT rates did have significance, it was proven that 8% of silymarin users had significant improvement. This alone is significant especially for the screened control group randomized.

    Problems with the study:
    1. Small sample size.
    2. Limited to patients unsuccessfully treated with interferon-based therapy.
    3. Limited to patients with median ALT of 107, median HCV RNA 1,600,000 (medium viral load), and not currently using milk thistle or antioxidants.
    4. Possible financial conflict of interest. The authors of this study disclosed potential conflict of interests by receiving research grants from pharmaceutical companies that make drugs for hepatitis C treatment.
    5. This group of non-responders may not have responded to treatment for a variety of unknown reasons and do not represent the majority of hepatitis C patients.
    6. ALT and HCV RNA are blood serum markers and are very limited when evaluating liver health. The major maker of liver health is liver histology that can be partially confirmed with a liver biopsy.

    There is extensive pharmacological literature on the positive hepatoprotective activity of silymarin. We do not know if silymarin slows the progression of liver fibrosis (as claimed). We do not know how silymarin protects the liver.

    One can conclude that there is little value in the findings of this current study that can be applied to the majority of patients with chronic hepatitis C.

    Hank
    You know these things because they are disclosed.  If a scientist gets a grant from the NSF, for example, the NSF has its own political and cultural priorities.  Is it a conflict of interest?  No.  And of course the patients were unsuccessfully treated with interferon-based therapy, that is the whole point.

    Are all initial studies in JAMA such schlock or do you have a conflict of interest that leads you to judge this one so harshly?
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind
    Another hatchet job paid for by your gigantic friendly and concerned for all our heath,drug companies.We know that they really care because they fund and pay for the medical colleges and really have to pay for all that propaganda that we are better off paying for 7 or 8 drugs to live pain free.Now here is my take from the guys who are real doctors:Hep C is a VIRAL disorder.Silamarin doesn't kill viruses so why would you give it without something that would disable the virus?Because then you can claim that it doesn't work.What do viruses have in common?They can't inter into a cell in the presence of a certain level of selenium.The doctors in the know would prescribe 200 mcg of selenium in addition to 300 mgs of standardized milk thistle and 300 mgs of D-lipoic acid.I'm no doctor but my brother who has hep c is in remission with that mixure.His level of virus went to below level of measurement after only 90 days and has been relatively healthy for 5 yrs.Please look up Dr.Burt Burkson MD,PHD. Milk thistle has more than 2000 yrs of history and I have used it on one of my English Setter,who's biliruben level was 13x's normal levels.The vet was telling me he wasn't likely to recover.I took him home and gave him 400 mgs of 80% silimarin for 5 days.He is still alive and healthy 3 yrs later.He is now 12 y.o. and goes on our daily walks up to 3 miles.This dog was harmed by the vet who put him on prednison for almost 2 months for ear infection.I cured him of that with the cockerspanial ear solution that is posted on the Enet.Once again they made a study with the intent of discrediting a known and reliable treatment for a big money maker for Modern Medicine.What could be a managable condition with little impact on a persons quality of life is now made into a hugh revenue stream that ultimately causes the person to die a miserable,slow and painful death and likely causes the persons family to be impoverished.Got to love these vampires we call our Doctors.Big Business Medicine has a big problem that they didn't have in the past:The Enternet.We can access information that previously wasn't available to us and there are doctors out there that are intent on really living up to their Hipocritic Oath of Doing no Harm and only helping.Seek them out.Dr.Jullian Whitaker is using the "Triple Therapy" of lipoic acid,selenium,silimarin.Quack Watch hates him.There is no better of an endorsment than that!!!! pcal

    Hank
    So science is too right wing and corporate oriented because you gave this to your dog?
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind