Banner
    Soda Consumption Causes Pancreatic Cancer?
    By News Staff | February 8th 2010 12:00 AM | 3 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    A new report in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention suggests that individuals who consume two or more sodas per week face an increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer by nearly twofold compared to individuals who do not consume soft drinks.

    Researchers followed 60,524 men and women in the Singapore Chinese Health Study for 14 years. During that time, there were 140 pancreatic cancer cases. Those who consumed two or more soft drinks per week (averaging five per week) had an 87 percent increased risk compared with individuals who did not. No association was seen between fruit juice consumption and pancreatic cancer.

    The results from Singapore are likely applicable to the United States. "Singapore is a wealthy country with excellent health care. Favorite pastimes are eating and shopping, so the findings should apply to other western countries," said University of Minnesota professor Marc A. Pereira

    Although people who consume soft drinks on a regular basis, defined as primarily carbonated sugar-sweetened beverages, tend to have a poor behavioral profile overall, the effect of these drinks on pancreatic cancer may be unique. "The high levels of sugar in soft drinks may be increasing the level of insulin in the body, which we think contributes to pancreatic cancer cell growth," Pereira said.

    Despite the findings, other researchers urged caution, suggesting that the study results are intriguing but have some key limitations that should be considered in any interpretation. "Although this study found a risk, the finding was based on a relatively small number of cases and it remains unclear whether it is a causal association or not. Soft drink consumption in Singapore was associated with several other adverse health behaviors such as smoking and red meat intake, which we can't accurately control for," said Mayne, an editorial board member of Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention.

    Pereira points out that the findings are biologically plausible, held up in non-smokers, remained similar after taking other dietary habits into account and are consistent with findings in Caucasian populations.


    Citation: Mueller et al., 'Soft Drink and Juice Consumption and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: The Singapore Chinese Health Study', Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, February 2010, 19(2), 447–55; doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0862

    Comments

    OK I DON'T GET THIS. SO LIKE MY FATHER DRINKS A LOT OF RED BULL, SO CAN RED BULL CAUSE PANCREAS CANCER? AND SOMETIMES MY SCHOOL I DON'T EAT THE FOOD THERE OR DRINK THERE I BUY JUICE TO DRINK THERE. SO DRINKING TOMPICA JUICE OR TROPICA JUICE(I FORGOT THE NAME BTW) CAUSE CANCER? AND ALSO WILL THERE BE A CURE FOR THIS CANCER DISEASE? PLEASE ANSWER ME I WANT TO LEARN MORE AND I WANT TO BE SAFE. THANK YOU
    P.S
    MY BABY BROTHER IS ALSO WORRIED AND HE AND I WANT TO KNOW CAN CANDY ALSO CAUSE PANCREAS CANCER?? THANK YOU AND PLEASE ANSWER ME :)

    Anonymous above...don't worry about it. Like most of the dietary studies out there, the statistics are dubious at best. 140 cases out of over 60,000 participants ( 0.23%) is statistically insignificant. If they were actually using the scientific method, this would be the basis for a hypothesis which would be studied in more detail. It is unlikely that it will be followed up by any actual studies that would confirm or deny the hypothesis, so in a few years, it'll become common wisdom that sugary soda causes pancreatic cancer...and everyone will forget that there were no scientific studies actually done on the process. If you investigate the history of dietary fat, you will find the same story. Dubious statistical studies...however, they did try to follow up with detailed studies that focused solely on fat consumption...but those studies couldn't reach statistical significance, so all current studies on fat consumption use the same process as this study...look at a large population, and perform very shady statistical tricks to show a very weak correlation. Because the numbers are so small, they try claiming things like "Double the chances of ..." or "Double the risk of ...".

    So, actually all this study did was show that 0.23% of the studied population got pancreatic cancer compared to 0.12% of the actual population. Try plugging those numbers into any statistical calculator you can find on the web and it'll throw an error, because once you get below 1%, statistics actually are irrelevant.

    Of course, all of these facts don't make for very good press. :-)

    Everything is bad for you except for lettuce and water. And maybe meat twice a year.

    Add a comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite><TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe><u><font>
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    CAPTCHA
    If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.