Banner
    Species Size Follows A Universal Distribution?
    By News Staff | March 4th 2013 07:30 PM | 3 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments

    A new paper says that flocks of birds, schools of fish, and groups of any other living organisms might have a mathematical function in common - body sizes are distributed according to the same mathematical expression, where the only unknown is the average size of the species in an ecosystem. 

    Several observations in the study suggest to them that the size distribution function could be universal. The observations were made in the lab using 14 species of aquatic microorganisms, including unicellular and multicellular ones that are very distant from an evolutionary point of view. 

    The microorganisms varied by four orders of magnitude, the difference in size between a mouse and an elephant. The mathematical function describing the size distribution remained unchanged even when the species adapted to new environments - changes in water temperature, the presence of absence of competitors - by changing their average size. 

    Based on these observations, they suggest that two separate factors work in tandem to shape the size distribution of a species. First, environmental factors influence the average size of a species. Second, physiological factors, or genetics, cause the observed variability of species sizes around the average size. 

    From species to communities

    So far the focus of research has been on the size distribution of individuals of a single species. But physicist Andrea Giometto of École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne says these new findings become particularly interesting in light of an observation that is well known to ecologists. "If you take a cup of water from the sea and analyze all of the microorganisms it contains, you find that in an ecological community no size tends to be over or underrepresented."

    Mathematically, the sizes can be described by a power-law distribution. 

    Taken together, these observations of size distributions within a species and within all the species in a given ecological community have interesting implications. If in an ecosystem several species begin to converge around the same size, a balancing force will kick in to restore the power-law distribution, either by acting on the abundance or size of each species.

    If, as they speculate, their observations are valid beyond the species they studied, they may provide additional evidence for the existence of universal laws that govern natural ecosystems. These laws would regulate not only the size and abundance of organisms in an ecosystem, but also other properties, such as the number of species that co-exist.

    Is it accurate? Finding power-laws and using them to describe complex systems already has a successful track record. "In physics, the observation that systems followed power-laws was instrumental in understanding phase transitions. We believe that power-laws can be similarly helpful to gain a deeper understanding of how systems of living matter work," says Giometto, who is seeking to apply methods from physics to understanding biological ecosystems.

    Published in PNAS.




    Comments

    Gerhard Adam
    Perhaps if those power laws can demonstrate whether or not humans are over-represented [as well as all their domesticated animals], then it may mean something.  Otherwise, it just seems rather obvious that size is going to correlate to energy requirements and that any particular biological niche will balance this amongst all the competitors within a specific environment.
    Perhaps the species power law could be used to indicate whether a species, or ecocystem, is under stress? Might be a way to guage fisheries stress? Who knows.
    Your "otherwise" comment is kind of flippant whoever, as we often figure things out before we determine an application.

    Gerhard Adam
    The problem with these sorts of mathematical models, is that they almost never ask ... what else would one expect?  After all, isn't this simply a restatement of the "balance of nature" platitude?

    Obviously size is going to correlate to energy requirements.  Similarly one would expect to see interactions regarding the resources available, so that all organisms don't focus on exactly the same thing.  As a result, we would expect a general distribution of species that indicate that those with higher energy requirements would have a smaller representation in any particular environment, while those with lower energy requirements should more readily fill these niches. 

    My point is that if we're going to create a mathematical model out of this, then we need an explanation for what the model is supposed to be demonstrating.  If it's simply to demonstrate that such a correlation exists, then it's simply a mathematical parlor trick.