Banner
    Transparent Solar Film Uses Tinted Windows To Generate Electricity
    By News Staff | June 17th 2012 12:44 PM | 6 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments

    Heliatek GmbH, a technology company in the field of organic photovoltaics, has announced that its transparent solar films could be used to be integrated between the glass sheets of double glazed windows. These windows would look like tinted glass as the unique vapor deposition technology for the solar films allows for a homogeneous coating of the solar layer without any distracting patterns or irregularities.  

     The ultra-thin solar films by Heliatek lend themselves to integration between glass. The transparency level as well as the color can be tuned to suit the customers' requirements. Measurements by SGS, an accredited and independent testing facility, have confirmed that Heliatek's lab cells still offer an efficiency of 7 % at a light transmission level of 23.5 %. Currently, the company can produce a transparency level of up to 40 % in its laboratories in Dresden, Germany, and sees the possibility to increase this to 50 % when the transparent solar films will be supplied to the building industry with the launch of the next production line in 2014. 


    Heliatek transparent solar film

     SGS had previously confirmed in another measurement campaign the superior low light and high temperature performance of Heliatek's cells compared to traditional solar technologies. At an irradiation of only 100 W/msquared the efficiency is 15 % higher compared to the standard efficiency measured at 1,000 W/msquared. The cell efficiency also remains constant with rising temperatures in contrast to traditional solar technology, which efficiency drops by 15 % to 20 % at elevated temperatures. Dr. Martin Pfeiffer, co-founder and CTO of Heliatek, said, "Our thin and lightweight solar films can be integrated directly into various kinds of building materials, so there is no need for separate mounting structures. As the film maintains its efficiency at high temperatures, unlike traditional PV technologies, no cooling is required. Similarly, its low light capabilities mean that the orientation and angle of the film is not critical and it maintains its efficiency even when cloudy, north-facing, or in the morning and evening." 

     Heliatek recently announced a joint development agreement with RECKLI to integrate its solar films onto concrete building walls. This will enable vertical concrete walls to become highly efficient solar energy harvesters without the need for supporting structures or cooling mechanisms. 

    Key to Heliatek's technology is the family of small organic molecules - oligomers - developed and synthesized at its own lab in Ulm, Germany. Heliatek is the only solar company in the world that uses the deposition of small organic molecules in a low temperature, roll-to-roll vacuum process. Its solar tandem cells are made of nanometers-thin layers of high purity and uniformity. This technology is very similar to the well-established OLED technology (organic LEDs) except that it operates in reverse, taking in light to create electricity.

    Heliatek is currently working with glass and other building material manufacturers to include its solar film technology in their products. "Our solar films offer unique and compelling key benefits for all kinds of building integration applications. Thus, our business model is to be the leading supplier of customized solar films to the building and construction material industry. They will integrate our solar films as energy harvesting components into their products," comments Thibaud Le Séguillon, CEO of Heliatek.


    Comments

    Tony Fleming
    We are on the road to a new way of getting energy for our houses. Maybe the dream of remote energy will become a reality in the not too distant future. 
    Where can I buy it??
    Tony Fleming Biophotonics Research Institute tfleming@unifiedphysics.com
    It is nice to dream about being off the grid. Not budgeting for energy vs groceries, etc. However, It is not likely to happen in my neck of the woods. At least not for the forseeable future.

    My little hamlet resides in the southern portion of the great plains. We have abundant winds and plenty of sunshine most days. Our local governments do not want the citizens to have control of their own utilities. (As a matter of fact, the mayor and city manager got a regulation passed that says we cannot drill for, nor produce, water within the city limits. The reason? The city could not collect fees and taxes for items which they don't control.)

    There are huge wind farms hereabout. There are even a few individually owned wind generators, but they are on rural properties. Driving around town you can see a few roof-top solar installations. Not many though.

    I suspect that when (if) suitable residential solar generators come down enough in price that most common folk can afford them, our local officials will outlaw their use. Or else raise fees and other taxes substantially. Most likely the latter.

    The overall effect of having the residential solar generators, and suitable collector/battery equipment, will be good for the environment. There will be no net savings for the individual home owner.

    Hank
    I agree it may not be a money savings, much less profit, but this is an instance where I have argued early and often that energy is a strategic resource and therefore does not need to be profitable.  Wheat and milk are not profitable but we do not want them outsourced to global competitors and energy can be the same thing.  It just shouldn't be wildly unprofitable, like pissing away $72 billion in two years on 'alternative' energy that isn't really very good yet - which we did. $2,000 for every man, woman and child without interest porkbarrelling companies and their current technology instead of basic research.
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind
    I'm with you 100%. Even more so since this is a German outfit. We seem to be tied to the umbilical of China, and I would like to see some different players.

    If this new tech can provide more output for less cost, then it should be a winner. And, like you always say, if it's profitable it doesn't need any subsidy.

    This idea is a little bit like the one that wraps a solar panel around a circular light pole to power LED street lighting. It's incredibly inefficient (as photovoltaics go)! If you're going to use solar power, you want it to be as an efficient a process as possible so it at least has some chance of paying for itself. Now where there are no other power sources (remote locations), solar power makes total sense, but it's not cost effective otherwise. Not that we shouldn't be investing in solar power. I firmly believe we should. We should just put our investment in a worthwhile cause and that means solar power that is efficient, efficient, efficient!! Put on your roof, put in your meadow. Put it in your window????????

    Hank
    7% efficient today is as good as anything was 10 years ago but I agree the hype machine has been in for decades.  Still, unless the government is subsidizing this (and it happens in America, plenty of poor people in Compton are subsidizing solar installations for rich people in Malibu) it would seem to be fine.

    Efficiency is something of a false metric anyway; photosynthesis is only 5% efficient yet no one says plants don't do well on solar power.  
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind