UK Children Have One Of The Highest Death Rates In Western Europe
    By News Staff | May 4th 2014 07:00 AM | 2 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments

    Although, by international standards, the UK has very low rates of deaths in children, within western Europe the UK has a higher rate of deaths in children than nearly every other country in the region.

    The mortality rate in the UK for children under five is 4.9 deaths per 1000 births, more than double that in Iceland (2.4 per 1000 births), the country with the lowest mortality rates. 3800 children under five died in the UK in 2013, the highest absolute number of deaths in the region.

    The findings in The Lancet come from a new study coordinated by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington.

    In addition to calculating overall mortality rates for children under five, the researchers also analyzed mortality rates for subdivided age categories. The UK was shown to have the worst outcomes compared with nearly every other western European nation for early neonatal deaths (death between 0 and 6 days), post-neonatal deaths (death between 29 and 364 days), and the worst outcomes of any country for childhood deaths (death between 1 and 4 years).

    Child mortality rates are substantially worse in Central Europe (average mortality rate 6.7 deaths per 1000 births) and Eastern Europe (average mortality rate 9.7 deaths per 1000 births); the UK's under-5 mortality rate is comparable to that of Serbia and Poland. Outside of Europe, the UK has a higher child mortality rate than Australia, Israel, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea.

    "We were surprised by these findings because the UK has made so many significant advances in public health over the years," said Dr Christopher Murray, Director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and the study's senior author. "The higher than expected child death rates in the UK are a reminder to all of us that, even as we are seeing child mortality decline worldwide, countries need to examine what they are doing to make sure more children grow into adulthood."

    Obviously abortions make a difference. In countries where abortions occur due to the potential for serious problems, there are fewer child mortality cases because fewer unhealthy children are ever born.

    Globally, rates of child deaths have been declining since 1990, with a sharper rate of decline in many countries observed since the Millennium Development Goals were established in 2000. In the UK, although the rate of child deaths per 1000 births declined overall between 1990 and 2013, but the rate of decline has slowed, and in 2000-2013 was half that seen in the previous decade (1990).

    Source: The Lancet


    This news may reflect badly on medical expertise in the UK, but is it in itself bad news? If we wish to maintain the "quality" of the race, we have to accept the Daltonian "survival of the fittest" principle, which means we have to lose a certain number (and up to a point, the more the better) of our weaker brethren before they reach the age of reproduction. And the sooner they go, the less is the burden on society, so seen from an economic perspective, a reasonably high child mortality rate is not so bad.

    It's not as cynical as all that. A modern society will try to keep as many people alive as possible, that's what an ethical medical community does. Clearly a lot of countries do have a more eugenics-based approach and abort if there might be an issue. The UK, US and other countries with higher mortality are penalized when results are framed this way - because they are trying to keep born babies alive and that does not always work. It doesn't make medical care bad.