As sure as death and taxes, and as timely as a Swiss watch, the Tevatron collider never ceases to awe us. Well into its twentysixth year of life, the aged and celebrated proton-antiproton collider sitting just a few meters underground in the west Chicago suburbs hit the mark of 10 inverse femtobarns of collisions delivered to the core of the CDF and DZERO detectors.
10 inverse femtobarns! Ten inverse femtobarns of proton-antiproton collisions is a HELL of a lot of them. Plus, you should multiply that number by two, since the same number of collisions happened inside two different collision areas -those manned by the two competing collaborations.
If you need a measure of what 20 inverse femtobarns of collisions mean, walk to the beach. A mile-long stretch of sand, extending 100 meters into the land and with a depth of one meter, contains roughly the same number of sand grains as that number of collisions. Absolutely awesome. On the other hand, if you were downplaying it, you could shrug your shoulders and claim that the total mass of annihilated protons would just make a picogram of matter. Protons are tiny, but we need lots of them to study subnuclear matter!
The graph below shows very clearly the progress of Tevatron data collection in the course of the last ten years. In red you can see the integrated luminosity, which should be read off on the axis on the right; in green the thin bars show the weekly integrated luminosity, which describes how the accumulation rate has increased for many years, and now stabilized to roughly 55 inverse picobarns per week.
Another way to picture what do 20 inverse femtobarns of data mean is to make simple calculations. Take the Z boson, the carrier of neutral weak currents that Carlo Rubbia in 1983 extracted with a lot of sweating from the lower energy and lower intensity SppS collider (five events in total, if I remember correctly, were all it took him to claim the discovery of that new boson, which together with the W boson signal allowed him to secure a Nobel Prize in Physics). The Z boson at the Tevatron has a production cross section of about 8 nanobarns: since 2002 the Tevatron has therefore created in the core of CDF and DZERO a total ofsuch particles.
Another example ? By using a temporary suspension of disbelief, assume that the Standard Model is correct, and that the Higgs boson exists and has a mass of 120 GeV. In that case, as many as 20,000 such particles have already been created inside the detectors. Twenty thousand!! How can such a signal have escaped ? Unfortunately, the Higgs is a quite eclectic particle, and only few of its possible decay modes are suitable for its clear observation amidst huge backgrounds from less interesting processes capable of mimicking its disintegration...
The Tevatron might end its operations in less than one year, or continue to run until the end of 2014. Its future is in the hands of philanthropists. If you are sitting on a pile of cash, consider donating 150 million dollars for a just cause.
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- 2004 BL86 - 'Near Miss' Asteroid Even Has Its Own Moon
- Reviews In Physics - A New Journal
- Wiggles: Inconsistencies Undermine Model Reliability For Projecting Decade-To-Decade Warming
- If Abortion Is A Choice Then Sex Selection Abortion Should Remain Legal
- Partly Wrong With A Chance Of Being Right: Why Are Weather Forecasts Still So Inaccurate?
- Planet With Rings Found Outside Solar System - And They Are Bigger Than Saturn
- Happy 150th Birthday To Maxwell's Theory Of Electromagnetism
- "That is the kind of thing that insures sociology stays in the humanities buildings. Your..."
- "Maybe it's this you wanted instead: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex or search OMIM: http..."
- "I think you are just being coy, or JAQing. Try this for starters perhaps: http://othersociologist..."
- "I first thought of asking “Could you please enlighten us?”, but in a posh-ish Anglo accent..."
- "Hi T, Thanks for the note on the CMS result on Majorana neutrinos. However this is not surprising..."